期刊文献+

不良资产处置方式及影响因素分析 被引量:12

A Study on the Disposal Manner of Non-performing Loans and Its Influencing Factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文使用LossMetrics数据库中处置结束的不良资产,研究不同处置方式下不良资产回收率差异及影响因素。研究发现,不同处置方式之下不良资产回收率存在比较大的差异;不同处置方式的选择主要取决于不良资产的质量特征,但处置方式的选择对不良资产的回收也有显著的影响,资产管理公司在不良资产处置的实践中更多地采用了相对好的处置方式。 This paper studies the recovery rate difference of non-performing loans with various disposal manner and its influencing factors based on the disposed non-performing Loans in the LossMetrics database.Results show that great difference exists in the recovery rate of Non-performing loans with different disposal manner.Selection of disposal manner is dependent on the quality characteristics of non-performing loans,however,the selection also exhibits a significant impact on the recovery rate of non-performing loans.Asset Management Companies choose relatively appropriate disposal manner in practice.
出处 《数理统计与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期279-290,共12页 Journal of Applied Statistics and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.70933003) 国家973计划(No.2007CB814902)的资助
关键词 不良资产 处置方式 回收率 回归分析 non-performing loans disposal manner recovery rate regression analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Fung Ben, George J, Hohl S, and Ma Guo-nan, Public Asset Management Companies in East Asia, a Comparative Study [C]. Bank of International Settlement, FSI Occasional Paper No.3, 2004, 1-67.
  • 2Mukherjee P. Dealing with NPAs: lessons from international experiences [J]. Money & Finance, 2003: 64-90.
  • 3Dilip K D. Asian Economy and Finance: A Post-Crisis Perspective [M]. Springer, 2001.
  • 4Yang L, Hu J L and Liu Hsin-Wei. Non-performing loans and bank efficiencies: an application of the input distance function approach [J]. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 2009, 12(3), 435-450.
  • 5佟铁成.日、韩两国银行业不良资产处置比较与启示[J].湖北经济学院学报,2004,2(3):24-27. 被引量:1
  • 6Merton Robert C. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates [J]. Journal of Finance, 1974, 29(2): 449 -470.
  • 7Altman E, Kishore M. Almost everything you always wanted to know about recoveries on defaulted bonds [J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 1996, 52(6): 57-64.
  • 8Frye J. Collateral damage: A source of systematic credit risk [J]. Risk Magazine, 2000, 4:91 -94.
  • 9Francesca. Loss Given Default on a medium-sized Italian bank's loan: An empirical exercise [R], 2005.
  • 10Araten, Jacobs. Measuring LGD on commercial loans: an 18 years internal study [J]. RMA Journal, 2004, 86(8): 96 -103.

二级参考文献13

  • 1武剑.内部评级法中的违约损失率(LGD)模型——新资本协议核心技术研究[J].国际金融研究,2005(2):15-22. 被引量:27
  • 2沈沛龙,崔婕.内部评级法中违约损失率的度量方法研究[J].金融研究,2005(12):86-95. 被引量:19
  • 3叶晓可,刘海龙.银行不良贷款违约损失率结构特征研究[J].上海管理科学,2006,28(6):12-15. 被引量:21
  • 4Altman E, Kishore M. Almost everything you always wanted to know about recoveries on defaulted bonds[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 1996(52): 57-64.
  • 5Araten, Jacobs. Measuring LGD on commercial loans: An 18 years internal study[J]. RMA Journal, 2004(86): 28-35.
  • 6Elliot E, David E. Measuring loss on defaulted bank loans: A 24-year study[J]. Journal of Commercial Lending, 1995(77): 11-23.
  • 7Francesca. Loss given default on a medium-sized Italian bank's loan: An empirical exercise[J]. 2005(3).
  • 8Frye J. Collateral damagei A source of systematic credit risk[J]. Risk, 2000(4): 188-203.
  • 9Altman E, Resti A, Sironi A. Default recovery rates in credit risk modeling: A review of the literature and empirical evidence[J]. Economic Notes, 2004(33): 183-208.
  • 10Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks[J]. Machine Learning, 1995(20): 273-297.

共引文献8

同被引文献85

引证文献12

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部