期刊文献+

服务商风险厌恶下研发外包中的最优客户参与激励 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 客户参与外包的研发项目能降低创新的不确定性,减少不确定的风险成本,从而激励服务商努力工作,但客户的参与是有成本的。针对客户如何实施最优参与激励问题,建立了客户参与下的委托代理模型,研究了客户参与激励与收益共享激励的内在逻辑关系,分析了服务商风险厌恶度对最优客户参与激励的影响。研究表明,随着客户参与度的增加,与之匹配的收益共享激励系数也应增加;服务商风险厌恶度与最优客户参与激励之间并非单调关系,当风险厌恶度较小时,两者正相关,而当风险厌恶度较大时,两者负相关;当服务商风险中性和完全风险厌恶时,客户都将不参与外包研发项目。
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期98-102,共5页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70871128)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1BONE S. R&D outsourcing[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 1996,26 (7):3-5.
  • 2MICHAEL J M. Does being R&D intensive still discourage out-sourcing.'? [J]. Evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Research Policy, 2005,34(4) :571-582.
  • 3HIGGINS M J, RODRIGUEZ D. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,80(2) :351-383.
  • 4ULSET S. R&D outsourcing and contractual governance An empirical study of commercial R~D projects[J]. Jour hal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1996,30 ( 1 ) 63-82.
  • 5王安宇,司春林,骆品亮.研发外包中的关系契约[J].科研管理,2006,27(6):103-108. 被引量:48
  • 6王安宇.研发外包契约类型选择:固定支付契约还是成本附加契约[J].科学管理研究,2008,26(4):34-37. 被引量:20
  • 7LAI E L C,RIEZMAN R,WANG P. Outsourcing of inno-vation[J]. Economic Theory,2009,38(3) :485-515.
  • 8HOWELLS J,GAGLIARDI D,MALIK K. The growth and management of R&D outsourcing: evidence from UK phar- maceutieals[J]. R&D Management,2008,38(2):205-219.
  • 9CHEN S. Task partitioning in new product development teams:A knowledge and learning perspective[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2005,22(4) :291-314.
  • 10ABE T. Technological outsourcing in corporate R&D ac-tivities[J]. Tetsu to Hagane-Journal of the Iron and StellInstitute of Japan,2004,90(4) :31-37.

二级参考文献25

  • 1刘东,徐忠爱.关系型契约特殊类别:超市场契约[J].经济理论与经济管理,2004,24(9):54-59. 被引量:33
  • 2吉炳安,王镜宇,罗云峰.国防采购中R&D成本补偿模型的效率分析[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,39(2):177-179. 被引量:6
  • 3王安宇,司春林,骆品亮.提升合作研发绩效的组织措施[J].科技导报,2005,23(10):59-62. 被引量:2
  • 4Rogerson W P. Economic incentives and the defense procurement Process [ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, (8) : 65 -90.
  • 5Corbett C J, Zhou D and Tang C S. Designing supply contracts: contract type and information asymmetry [ J ]. Management Science, 2004, (50): 550-559.
  • 6Rothkopf M H. Equilibrium linear bidding strategies [ J]. Operation Research,1980, (28) : 576 -583.
  • 7Stiglitz J & Weiss A. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information [J]. American Economic Review, 1981, (71), 393 -410. 240.
  • 8Bajari P & Tadelis S. Incentive versus transaction costs: a theory of procurement contracts[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, (32) : 384 -407.
  • 9Mcafee R P & Mcmillan J. Bidding for Contracts : A Principal - Agent Analysis [ J ]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1986, (17) : 326 -338.
  • 10Shenhar A J & Dvir D. Toward a typological theory of project management[J]. Research Policy, 1996, (25) : 607 - 632.

共引文献61

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部