期刊文献+

双不对称下的技术投资竞争决策 被引量:6

Decision about competition of technology investment under double asymmetric
下载PDF
导出
摘要 投资成本、质量(技术)水平以及外部市场偏好将影响不同创新产品或技术的出现顺序.通过考虑创新投资成本、质量(技术)水平、市场偏好等因素构建实物期权投资决策模型,研究了创新成本和产品质量水平都不对称的企业间的竞争决策和合作决策.研究结果表明,无论高成本的高质量企业还是低成本的低质量企业均可能成为领先者,1)企业间产品质量差距越大,两竞争企业的投资时间间隔越小,市场偏好越高,则两企业投资时间间隔越长;2)企业间合作的结果永远是低质量企业先投资,高质量企业后投资,而且竞争和合作投资两种情况下的同质量产品出现的时间差距随着成本差距的增大而增大,随着两企业产品质量差距的增大而缩小,随着市场偏好的增大而增大. The sequence of introduction of different technologies or product is affected by the difference in technology level (product quality) and investment cost between two technologies or products, and the preference of market. By taking in to consideration of the factors of the preference of market, the difference in technology level, and product quality and cost, this paper constructs a real option model to analyze the equilibrium of competition investment strategy, and cooperation investment of two competitive firms. This study shows that, ( 1 ) firms, either with a high quality and high cost, or a low quality and low cost, may become a leader; further the larger the quality difference, the shorter the interval between the two competition firms; and the higher market preference, the longer the interval between to two competition firms the. (2) Asa result of cooperation investment, the low quality technology" always appears first, and then the high quality one. In the two cases of cooperation investment and competition investment, the interval of the introduction of corresponding technologies increases with the of the cost difference, decreases with the quality difference, and increases with of market preference.
作者 邓光军 曾勇
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期1-18,共18页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70272001) 高校博士点基金资助项目(教技发中心函[2004]164号) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助项目(教技函[2005]35号)
关键词 技术创新 实物期权 博弈均衡 合作创新 technology innovation real options game equilibrium cooperation innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1张云华,梁雄健.无线市话“小灵通”市场竞争力剖析[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2004,6(1):10-14. 被引量:1
  • 2Shaked A,Sutton J.Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation. The Review of Economic Studies . 1982
  • 3Weeds H.Strategic delay in real options model of R&D competition. Review of Economics Studies . 2002
  • 4Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization. . 1988
  • 5Dasgupta P,Stiglitz J.Uncertainty, Industrial Structure and the Speed of R and D. The Bell Journal of Economics . 1980
  • 6Rosenkranz,Stephanie.Innovation and cooperation under vertical product differentiation. International Journal of Industrial Organization . 1995
  • 7Grenadier SR.The Strategic Exercise of Options: Development Cascades and Overbuilding in Real Estate Markets. The Journal of Finance . 1996
  • 8艾五荣.小灵通海外兴衰记[J].移动通信,2002,26(8):25-26. 被引量:1
  • 9Dixit AK,Pindyck RS.Investment under uncertainty. . 1994
  • 10周洋.是非功过“小灵通”[J].数字通信,2000,27(11):49-51. 被引量:1

二级参考文献22

  • 1刘益.波特“五力模型”的缺陷及其改进[J].管理工程学报,1999,13(S1):13-16. 被引量:15
  • 2[1]Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment Under Uncertainty[ M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
  • 3[2]Amram M, Kulatilaka N. Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
  • 4[3]Kulatilaka N, Perotti E C. Strategic growth options[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(8): 1021-1031.
  • 5[4]Kulatilaka N, Pertti E C. Time-to-market capability as Stackelberg growth options[A]. In: Schwartz E, Trigeorgis L, ed. Innovation and Strategy: New Developments and Applications in Real Options[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • 6[5]Pertti E C, Rossetto S. Internet Portals as Portfolios of Entry Options[R]. Working Paper, No. 00-105/2. Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam and CEPR, 2000. (http:∥www. tinbergen, nl/discussionpapers/00105, pdf)
  • 7[6]Reinganum J F. On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1981, 48(3): 395-405.
  • 8[7]Reinganum J F. Market structure and the diffusion of new technology[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1981, 12(2): 618-624.
  • 9[8]Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1985, 52(3): 383-401.
  • 10[9]Gotz G. Strategic timing of adoption of new technology under uncertainty: A note[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000, 18(2): 369-379.

共引文献25

同被引文献121

引证文献6

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部