期刊文献+

多种技术联合应用对肺癌诊断的临床价值 被引量:6

Diagnostic value of lung cancer by diferent methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价多种技术联合应用对肺癌诊断的临床价值。方法 884例痰脱落细胞学、细菌学、常规支气管镜等检查均无阳性发现的疑似肺癌的患者行经支气管镜针吸活检术(TBNA)和活检刷检、经支气管镜超声引导针吸活检术(EBUS-TB-NA)、纵隔镜、超声或CT引导经皮肺穿刺活检术、PET-CT和内科电子胸腔镜胸膜活检术。结果 215例患者TBNA、刷检、活检的阳性率分别为81.58%、29.47%和16.84%。15例EBUS-TBNA的阳性率为91.67%,20例超声或CT引导经皮肺穿刺活检术阳性率为65%,10例PET-CT阳性率为80%,628例患者胸腔镜检查的总体阳性率为94.6%。结论多种技术联合应用可明显提高肺癌的早期诊断率。 Objective To evaluate the combination of different methods in diagnosis of lung cancer.Methods884 patients with suspicious lung cancer had negative results via exfoliative cytology,bacteriology and routine bronchoscopy.All these patients had transbronchial needle aspiration(TBNA) with biopsy and brushing,endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration(EBUS-TBNA),mediastinoscopy,per cutem lung puncture needle aspiration under the guidance of type-B ultrasonic or CT,PET-CT and thoracoscopy.Results 215 patients were diagnosed by TBNA,biopsy and brushing.The positive rates were 81.58%,29.47% and 16.84%.15 patients by EBUS-TBNA with a positive rate of 91.67%,20 patients by per cutem lung puncture needle aspiration under the guidance of CT or type-B ultrasonic with a positive rate of 65%,10 patients by PET-CT with a positive rate of 80%,628 patients by electronic thoracoscopic biopsy and brushing with a positive rate of 94.6%.ConclusionThe combination of different methods significantly boost the rate of early diagnosis of lung cancer.
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2011年第4期574-576,共3页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
基金 山东省科技发展计划项目(2009GG10002061)
关键词 经气管镜超声引导针吸活检术 纵隔镜 胸腔镜 EBUS-TBNA Mediastinoscopy Thoracoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1赵辉,王俊,李剑锋,刘军,李运,刘彦国,陈应泰.纵隔镜检查在胸部结节病诊断中的价值[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(13):919-921. 被引量:22
  • 2Allibone L.Assessment and management of patients with pleural effusions.Nuts Stand 2006; 20:55-64.
  • 3Tan C,Sedrakyan A,Browne J,Swift S,Treasure T.The evidence on the effectiveness of management for malignant pleural effusion:a systematic review.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29:829-838.
  • 4Luh SP,then CY,Tzao CY.Malignant pleural effusion treatment outcomes:pleurodesis via video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus tube thoracostomy.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 54:332-336.
  • 5Porcel JM,Pena JM,Vicente de Vera C,Esquerda A,Vives M,Light RW.Bayesian analysis using continuous likelihood ratios for identifying pleural exudates.Respir Med 2006; 100:1960-1965.
  • 6Arapis K,Caliandro R,Stern JB,Girard P,Debrosse D,Gossot D.Thoracoscopic palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusions:results in 273 patients.Surg Endosc 2006;20:919-923.
  • 7Neragi-Miandoab S.Malignant pleural effusion,current and evolving approaches for its diagnosis and management.Lung Cancer 2006; 54:1-9.
  • 8Porcel JM,Vives M.Etiology and pleural fluid characteristics of large and massive effusions.Chest 2003; 124:978-983.
  • 9Artemiou O,Marta GM,Klepetko W,Wolner E,Muller MR.Pleurovenous shunting in the treatment of nonmalignant pleural effusion.Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76:231-233.
  • 10Emad A,Rezaian GR.Diagnostic value of closed percutaneous pleural biopsy vs pleuroscopy in suspected malignant pleural effusion or tuberculous pleurisy in a region with a high incidence of tuberculosis:a comparative,age-dependent study.Respir Med 1998; 92:488-492.

共引文献15

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部