期刊文献+

材料性质和专业对解决四卡片问题影响的眼动研究 被引量:1

Influence of data category and specialty on the Four-card Problem:an Eye-Movement Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨实验材料性质和专业背景等因素对四卡片推理问题解决的影响。方法:使用ASL-504眼动记录仪,以16名大学生为被试,采用2(材料性质)×2(专业)的二因素被试间设计。结果:材料性质主效应不显著,但材料性质在相对注视时间、相对注视次数和瞳孔直径上呈现显著差异;专业因素主效应显著,专业因素在平均注视时间和平均眼跳距离上差异显著,二因素交互作用不显著;"如果子句"和"那么子句"在所有眼动指标上不存在显著差异。结论:(1)抽象程度高的材料在理解四卡片问题时需要更多的加工,包括条件句及其组成部分;(2)不同专业背景对理解条件句有不同的影响;(3)条件句各组成部分在理解时得到同等重要的加工。 Objective:To examine the influence of data category and specialty on four-card problem.Methods:Using ASL 504 Eye-tracking system,16 undergraduates attended the experiment of a between-group design,which was 2(data category:abstract or con-crete)×2(specialty:arts or science).Results:① There was no significance on main effect of data category while considered the great standard,such as gaze time.② There was of significance on main effect of specialty while considered the major standard.③ There was no significant difference between two inclusive parts of conditional statement.Conclusion:① The four-card problem of abstract data needed more cognitive process,including condition statement and its inclusive parts.② Different specialty of subjects had different effect on comprehension of four-card problem.③ There had been comparably processed between two inclusive parts of conditional statement.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2011年第2期361-364,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 材料性质 四卡片问题 条件句 眼动研究 Data category Four-card problem Conditional sentence Study on eye movement
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Dawson,E., Gilovich,T., Regan,D.T. Motivated reasoning and perfor-mance on the Wason selection task [J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002, 28(10):1379-1387.
  • 2Maria Augustinova. Falsification cueing in collective reasoning: example of the Wason selection task [J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008,38(5): 770-785.
  • 3张霞.大中学生四卡问题推理能力发展的实验研究[J].心理学探新,2005,25(2):54-56. 被引量:4
  • 4邱琴,胡竹菁.条件推理的类比转换运用[J].心理学探新,2009,29(2):48-51. 被引量:1
  • 5Wason,P.C. Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem [J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,1971,23:63-71.
  • 6Manktelow,K.I. & Evans,J.St.B.T. Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-effect? British Journal of Psychology[J]. 1979, 70, 477-488.
  • 7张庆林,杨雄.四卡问题的内容促进效应的实验研究[J].心理科学,1997,20(4):311-313. 被引量:27
  • 8Just M. A., Carpenter P A. The psychology of reading and language comprehension[M]. Allyn and Bacon. Inc. 1987, 370-375.
  • 9葛明贵.指导语对解决四卡问题影响的实验研究[J].安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版),2001,29(2):267-269. 被引量:5
  • 10Wason,P.C.Reasoning about a rule [J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,20:273-281.

二级参考文献23

  • 1胡竹菁.“命题推理”的心理学研究综述[J].心理学探新,1999,19(1):28-35. 被引量:8
  • 2邓铸.眼动心理学的理论、技术及应用研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2005(1):90-95. 被引量:106
  • 3李小平,张庆林.四卡问题的执行功能新解释[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2006,28(2):34-38. 被引量:3
  • 4史滋福,邱江,张卫,张庆林.表征方式与数理图式对解决四卡问题的影响[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,31(5):177-181. 被引量:3
  • 5Wason P C. Reasoning about rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,20:273 - 281.
  • 6Johnson - Laird P N, Legrenzi P, Legerenzi M S. Reasoning and a sense of reality.British Journal of Psychology, 1972,63:395- 400.
  • 7Cheng P W, Holyoak K J. Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 1985,17:391 - 416.
  • 8Gick M L, Holyoak K J. Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 1983,15:1 - 38.
  • 9Wason PC, Brooks PG. THOG:The anatomy of a problem[J]. Psychological Research, 1979,41 ( 1 ) :79.
  • 10O'brien DP, Noveck IA, Davidson GM, et al. Sources of difficulty in deductive reasoning: the THOG task[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1990, 42 (2A) :329.

共引文献29

同被引文献12

  • 1周鹏生.民族院校大学生人际关系的“应然”和“实然”[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,20(9):53-56. 被引量:3
  • 2BONATTI L. Propositional Reasoning by Model [J]. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 1994, 101(4): 725-733.
  • 3JOHNSON-LAIRD P N. Deductive Reasoning [J], Annual Review of Psychology, 1999,50: 109— 135.
  • 4JOHNSON-LAIRD P N, BYRNE R M J. Conditionals: A Theory of Meaning,Pragmatics, and Inference [J]. Psycho-logical Review, 2002 , 109(4) : 646 — 678.
  • 5EVANS J S B T. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning,Judgment, and Social Cognition [J]. Annual Review Psychol-ogy, 2008, 59(1): 255-278.
  • 6EPLEY N, GILOVICH T. The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic Why the Adjustments rre Insufficient [J], Psycho-logical Science? 2006,17(4): 311 — 318.
  • 7HAIDT J. The Emotional Dog and its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment [J], Psychologi-cal Review, 2001., 108(4) : 814 — 834.
  • 8MATTHEWS P,RITTLE-JOHNSON B. In Pursuit of Knowledge: Comparing Self-Explanations, Concepts, and Proce-dures as Pedagogical Tools [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009,104(1) : 1 — 21.
  • 9邓立平.对“论三段论推理过程中结论正确性的两种判断标准”的几点评议[J].心理学报,1999,31(1):118-120. 被引量:3
  • 10胡竹菁.“心理模型”与“知识和试题双重结构模型”的实验比较研究[J].心理科学,1999,22(4):362-364. 被引量:14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部