期刊文献+

Matrix视野计N-30-F程序与倍频视野计N-30程序检测结果一致性的初步分析

A comparative study between the Humphery Matrix N-30-F and FDT N-30 tests
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价HumpheryMatrix视野计的N-30-F程序与倍频视野计(frequency—doublingtech—nology,FDT)N-30程序的检查结果是否具有一致性。方法对受检眼32例32只眼(原发性开角型青光眼10例10只眼,可疑青光眼患者13例13只眼,正常人3例3眼,高眼压症6例6只眼)进行上述两种视野程序检查,比较两种检查结果的平均偏差Mean Deviation,MD)、图型标准偏差(Pattern Standard Deviation,PSD)、总体偏差概率图中概率小于5%的缺损点数以及检查所需时间。结果MD、PSD及总体偏差概率图中概率小于5%的缺损点数,在两种视野程序检查结果间差异均无有统计学意义(分别为P=0.958。P=0.932,P=0.496),这些参数在这两种程序检查结果有显著相关性(分别为r=0.898,P〈0.01;r=0.559,P〈0.01;r=0.734,P〈0.01),并且两种检测结果有很高的一致性。检查所需时间,HumpheryMatrix为3’26”,FDT为5’14”(P〈O.01)。结论HumpheryMatrix视野计的N-30-F程序与FDTN-30程序的检查结果高度一致,并且前者检查所需时间更短。 Objective To determine the comparability of the N-30-F test with the new Humphrey Matrix instrument to the traditional frequency-doubling technology (FDT) N-30 test. Methods A sample of 32 eyes flom 32 patients (3 normal subjects, 6 with ocular hypertension, 10 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 13 with suspect glaucoma) underwent visual field testing with standard automated perimetry, and with FDT, using the FDT N-30 program, and the Matrix N-30-F program. The plots, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), defect locations on the Total Deviation Probability (TDP) and test time were compared. Results No statistically significant differences were found between corresponding parameters of the two tests. High coefficients and the agreement were associated with the MD values, the PSD values and the total number of abnormal test locations on the TDP plot of the two tests. The test time for the Matrix test was significantly shorter. Conclusions The FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests are comparable in screening for early diagnosis of glaucoma, and the test time for the Matrix test is significantly shorter.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期131-134,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词 倍频视野计 Humphery MATRIX 青光眼 视野检查 Frequency-doubling technology (FDT) Humphrey Matrix Glaucoma Visual field testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Maddess T,Goldberg I,Dobinson J,et al.Clinical trials of the frequency-doubling illusion as an indicator of glaucoma.(ARVO abstract)[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1995,36(Suppl):335.
  • 2Casson R,James B,Rubinstein A,et al.Clinical comparison of frequency-doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry[J].Br J Ophthalmol,2001,85:369-372.
  • 3Kelly DH.Frequency-doubling in visual responses[J].J Opt Soc Am,1996,56:1628-1633.
  • 4Glovinsky Y,Quigley HA,Dunkerlberger GT.Retinal ganglion cell loss is size-dependent in experimental glaucoma[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,1991,33:484-491.
  • 5Spry PG,Johnson CA,Mansberger SL,et al.Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma[J].J Glaucoma,2005,14:11-19.
  • 6无.我国原发性青光眼诊断和治疗专家共识[J].中华眼科杂志,2008,44(9):862-863. 被引量:212
  • 7Anderson AJ,Johnson CA,Fingeret M,et al.Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey Matrix perimeter[J].Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2005,46:1540-1548.
  • 8Paolo B,Maria LS,Marco Z,et al.Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix:a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.Acta Ophthalmol[J].Scand,2006,84:351-356.
  • 9陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:217
  • 10Medeiros FA,Sample PA,Weimeb RN.Frequency-doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2004,137:863-871.

二级参考文献4

  • 1赵希刚,李坤成,李永忠.单次屏气电影法MRI评价左心室功能的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(1):65-67. 被引量:12
  • 2Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet,1986,i:307-310.
  • 3Bland JM,Altman DG.Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.Statis tical Methodsin Medical Research,1999,8:135-160.
  • 4Najib Aziz,Michael RI,Sally SD,et al.Interpreting Method Comparison Studiesby Useofthe Bland-Altman Plot:Reflecting the Importance of Sample Sizeby Incorporating Confidence Limitsand Predefined Error Limitsinthe Graphic.Clinical Chemistry,2004,50 (11):2216-2222.

共引文献427

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部