期刊文献+

论国际商事仲裁中的法律选择 被引量:1

On the Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为争端解决方式之一的国际商事仲裁带有契约性质,当事人依照意思自治原则合意选择法律的意愿应当得到充分尊重。在国际商事仲裁实践中,当事人可以选择的法律包括:适用于解决其争端的准据法,适用于其仲裁协议的准据法,适用于仲裁进程的准据法,以及适用于选择前三项准据法的冲突法。但是,当事人对法律的选择并非绝对自由,而应受到有关国家公共政策、强行法以及基于国内法其他理由的限制。 As a means of dispute resolution,international commercial arbitration owns its contractual nature.According to the Party Autonomy Doctrine,the parties' freedom to select the law to govern their contract or dispute should be fully respected.In the practice of international commercial arbitration,the parties may choose the law including the law applicable to the merits of the dispute;the law applicable to the arbitration agreements;the law applicable to the arbitration proceeding;and the laws of conflict applied to select the one to be used for each of the above three.However,the party autonomy is not absolutely free,their choice of law must be restricted by the related country's public policy,jus cogens and the domestic laws based on the other reasons.
作者 张潇剑
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《求是学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期93-98,共6页 Seeking Truth
关键词 国际商事仲裁 法律选择 意思自治 限制 公共政策 强行法 international commercial arbitration choice of law autonomy of will restriction public policy jus cogens
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1BRANSON & WALLACE. Choosing the Substantive Law to Apply in International Commercial Arbitration [J]. Virginia Journal of International Law, 1986, (27).
  • 2C. ARDEN. McCLELLAND. Toward a More Mature System of International Commercial Arbitration: The Establishment of Uniform Rules of Procedure and the Elimination of the Conflict of Laws Question [J]. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulations, 1980, (5).
  • 3C. THEODORE . THEOFRASTOUS. Note, International Commercial Arbitration in Europe: Subsidiarity and Supremacy in Light of the De-Localization Debate[J]. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 1999, (31).
  • 4R. JAY. SEVER. Comment, The Relaxation of Inarbitrability and Public Policy Checks on U.S. and Foreign Arbitration: Arbitra- tion Out of Control?[J]. Tulane Law Review, 1991, (65).
  • 5M. JOSEPH. LOOKOFSKY. Transnational Litigation and Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Analysis of American, European, and International Law[M'. Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Transnational Juris Publications, 1992.
  • 6DICEY & MORRIS. The Conflict of Laws(twelfth edition)[M]. London: Sweet and Maxwell Ltd., 1993.
  • 7CARLO CROFF. The Applicable Law in an International Commercial Arbitration: Is it Still a Conflict of Laws Problem? [J]. The International Lawyer, 1982, (16).
  • 8NATHALIE VOSER. Current Development: Mandatory Rules of Law as a Limitation on the Law Applicable in International Commercial Arbitration[J ]. American Review of International Arbitration, 1996, (7).

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部