期刊文献+

反倾销法上从低征税规则的适用 被引量:3

Application of the Lesser Duty Rule in Anti-dumping Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 在欧盟等适用从低征税规则的WTO成员方,反倾销税并非一律根据倾销幅度确定,而是根据倾销幅度和损害幅度中的低者确定。从低征税规则具有合理性,不仅为越来越多的成员方所适用,而且在WTO多哈回合谈判中得到了绝大多数成员方的支持。从低征税规则适用的关键在于损害幅度的计算。作为欧盟计算损害幅度的两种基本方法,削价法和低价法在实践中得到了广泛的应用,对其他成员方具有重大的影响。中国应该在反倾销中适用从低征税规则,并借鉴欧盟的削价法和低价法。 The anti--dumping duty is determined by the dumping margin in some WTO members. In these members, the determination of injury, which is a requisite part in the anti--dumping investigation, is a qualitative decision concerned with whether dumped imports caused injury to a domestic industry. However, in some WTO members of which the EU is the representative, investigating authorities not only make a qualitative analysis on whether dumped imports caused injury to a domestic industry, but also make a quantitative analysis on the extent to which dumped imports caused. If the injury margin calculated as the result of the quantitative analysis is lower than the dumping margin, the anti--dumping duty is determined by the injury margin instead of the dumping margin. Such a practice is called "lesser duty rule" in anti--dumping law. The lesser duty rule is justifiable both in law and economics, and is widely applied by WTO members and supported by the overwhelming majority in the WTO Doha Round Negotiation. The crux of it is the calculation of the injury margin. The WTO Anti--dumping Agreement does not give any guidance on its calculation. In EU, who has the richest practices in its calculation, the price undercutting method and the price underselling method are widely used, which are widely accepted by other WTO members. The lesser duty rule is not applied by China and the anti--dumping duty is determined by the dumping margin. As this rule is justifiable and beneficial to China, China should amend its Anti-- dumping Regulation and incorporate the lesser duty rule in it, so as to apply this rule in anti-- dumping investigations. As for the methods of the calculation of the injury margin, the price undercutting method and the price underselling method should be used.
作者 张亮
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期182-192,共11页 Chinese Journal of Law
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目"WTO多哈回合反倾销规则谈判研究"(项目批准号:09G-16)的前期研究成果
关键词 从低征税规则 倾销幅度 损害幅度 《反倾销协定》 《反倾销条例》 anti--dumping duty, lesser duty rule, dumping margin, injury margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Sodium Glueonate from P.R. China, Official Journal of the European Union, L282, 2010, p. 27.
  • 2[美]理查德·A·波斯纳 蒋兆康译.《法律的经济分析》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997年6月版.第717页.
  • 3魏强.欲善其事,先利其器——欧盟反倾销调查中损害幅度的计算方法[J].WTO经济导刊,2004(4):78-79. 被引量:1
  • 4Harald Wenig, The European Community's Antidumping System: Salient Features, 39 J. W. T. 792 (2005).
  • 5Edwin Vermulst and Paul Waer, E.C. Antidumping Law and Practice, London: Sweet & Maxwell 1996, p. 844.
  • 6Council Regulation (EC) No. 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on Protection Against Dumped Imports from Coun-tries Not Members of the European Community,简称《384/96条例》.
  • 7Ivo Van Bael and Jean-francois Bellis, Anti-dumping and Other Trade Protection Laws of the EC, Hague, Kluwer Law International 2004, p. 310.
  • 8()pen Mesh Fabrics of Glass Fibres from P.R. China, Official Journal of the European Union, 1.43, 2011, p. 22.
  • 9Coated Fine Paper from P.R. China, Official Journal of the European Union, L299, 2010, p. 27.
  • 10Edwin Vermulst and Paul Waer, E.C. Antidumping Law and Practice, London: Sweet & Maxwell 1996,第359页.

共引文献53

同被引文献26

  • 1胡建国. 论反倾销和反补贴措施中的‘双重救济’问题-以中美某些产品‘双反’案为例[J]. WTO 法与中国论丛, 2012,201(1): 124.143.
  • 2Brian D. Kelly. Market economies and concurrent antidumpingand countervailing duty remedies [J]. Journal of InternationalEconomic Law, 2014, 17(1): 105.123.
  • 3Joris Cornelis, Folkert Graafsma. The appellate body’s findingson double remedies and EU practice: what if the lesser duty ruledoes not come to the rescue- [J]. International Trade Law &Regulation, 2012, 18(1): 20.27.
  • 4Dukgeun Ahn, Jieun Lee. Countervailing duty against China:opening a pandora’s box in the WTO system- [J]. Journal ofInternational Economic Law, 2011, 14(2): 329.368.
  • 5Appellate Body Report on US-ADs and CVDs(China) ,WT/DS379/AB/R,para.541.
  • 6Appellate Body Report on US-ADs and CVDs(China) ,WT/DS379/AB/R,para. 599.
  • 7Appellate Body Report on US-ADs and CVDs(China) ,WT/DS379/AB/R,para. 602.
  • 8Appellate Body Report on US-ADs and CVDs(China) ,WT/DS379/AB/R,para. 604.
  • 9US Government Accountability Office, U.S.-China Trade:Commerce Faces Practical and Legal Challenges in ApplyingCountervailing Duties, June 2005, Highlights, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-474.
  • 10Georgetown Steel Corp. v. United States, 801 F.2d 1308 (Fed.Cir. 1986), p. 1318.

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部