期刊文献+

英美诽谤法的特殊抗辩事由研究 被引量:5

英美诽谤法的特殊抗辩事由研究
原文传递
导出
摘要 英美诽谤法为实现保护言论自由和尊重个人名誉的平衡,设计了诸多精细的特殊抗辩事由,包括以真实性作为完全抗辩的依据; 涉及公共利益的、基于事实的、真诚的公允评论; 法律授予特殊场合的特权抗辩( 绝对特权和受约制特权) 及制定法规定的严格责任抗辩事由。这些抗辩事由使英美法诽谤法实现了法益平衡的目的。 In order to strike a balance between the protection of freedom of speech and respect for reputation of individual, Anglo-American defamation law has designed various special defenses of great meticulousness. The defenses available in common law include justification, which is related to truth; fair comment, which involves honest opinion on matters of public interest; absolute privilege, which protects statement made in judicial proceeding and legislative process; privilege which arises where the defendant is under a duty or has an interest, either legal, moral, or social, to make communication ; "apology and absence of malice" and "offer of amende after an unintentional defamation" as provided by law. These defenses are helpful to Anglo-American defamation law to realize its aim of balance of legal interests.
作者 潘诗韵
机构地区 中国社会科学院
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期129-142,共14页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献91

  • 1Littleton v. Hamilton (1974), 40.R. (2d) 283 (C.A.); Langev. Atkinson [1998] 3 N.Z.L.R. 424 (C.A.).
  • 2(1829)10 B & C263.
  • 3M'Pherson v. Daniels (1829) 10 B & C 263. at 272, 109 E.R. 448 at 451(K.B.).
  • 482 Fad 154 at 156 (2d Cir. 1936).
  • 5L. Klar, Tort Law,The Carswell Company Ltd, (2d ed. 1996) , p.565.
  • 6Ronald v. Harper, [1909] V. L. R. 450 (F. C. ) ; Cookson v. Harewood, [1932] 2 K. B. 478n (C. A. ) ; Nichotson V. Rust, 109 Ky. 369. 52 S.W. 933 (1899).
  • 7Restatement (Second) Torts, section 581 A, comment e.
  • 8[1997] QB 123.
  • 9Lewis v. Daily Telegraph Ltd. (1963), [1964] A.C. 234 at 260 (H.L.).
  • 10Lewis v. Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] A.C. 234.

二级参考文献9

  • 1T·巴顿·卡特等.《大众传播法概要》,黄列译,中国社会科学出版社1997年,第136-137页.第143-144页
  • 2《被告席上的记者》.1994年.上海人民出版社出版
  • 3Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd.(1999) 4 All ER609 HL
  • 4Geoffrey Robertson and Andrew Nicol:Media Law,Fourth Edition,Penguin Books,2005,p.128-129,p.133,p128
  • 5刘进图等.《传播法手册》第20页,香港新闻行政人协会,2006年版.
  • 6Jamed & Anor v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl.,[2005]EWCA Civ 74
  • 7魏永征.《被告席上的记者》,http://yzwei.blogbus.com/logs/4742135.html
  • 8胡鸿烈.《诽谤法》第8-9页,树仁法学丛书,1989年版
  • 9魏永征.舆论监督与“公众人物”[J].国际新闻界,2000,22(3):44-48. 被引量:13

同被引文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部