期刊文献+

基坑开挖对抗拔桩极限承载力影响的模型试验研究 被引量:16

Model tests on ultimate uplift capacity of piles under excavation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用模型试验的方法研究了砂土地基中基坑开挖对抗拔桩极限承载力的影响,试验过程中考虑了基坑开挖直径、开挖深度及坑底以下有效桩长不同的情况,共进行19组试验。试验结果表明:开挖深度相同时,基坑开挖直径越大,抗拔桩极限承载力下降越多,开挖直径为30 cm(10d)时,抗拔桩极限承载力较开挖前有明显下降,随着开挖直径的继续增加,极限承载力继续下降,但下降幅度逐渐减小,并趋于一个稳定值;开挖深度相同时,坑底以下有效桩长越短,开挖后抗拔桩极限承载力损失比例越大;开挖卸荷后坑内土体处于超固结状态,抗拔桩极限承载力大于土体为正常固结状态时,开挖深度相同时,坑底以下抗拔桩长度越短,开挖后桩周土体超固结比越大,抗拔桩极限承载力与土体正常固结状态相比增加比例越大;坑底以下有效桩长相同时,开挖深度越大,开挖后桩周土体超固结比越大,抗拔桩极限承载力也越大。 In order to realize the ultimate uplift capacity of model piles under excavation in sand,19 groups of model tests are conducted on different excavation diameters,depths,and different pile lengths under the bottom of pit.The results are obtained as follows: under the same excavation depth,the larger the excavation diameter is,the lower the ultimate uplift capacity of piles is.When the excavation diameter is 30 cm(10d),the ultimate uplift capacity of piles decreases sharply.When the excavation diameter continues to increase,the decrease of the ultimate uplift capacity of pile is small,then the ultimate uplift capacity of pile tends to have a stable value.Under the same excavation depth,the shorter the pile under the bottom of pit is,the larger the loss of the ultimate uplift capacity is.The soil is overconsolidated after excavation,and the ultimate uplift capacity of piles is larger than that of the piles in the normal consolidation soil.Under the same excavation depth,the shorter the pile under the bottom of pit is,the larger the increased proportion of the ultimate uplift capacity of pile to that of the pile in the normal consolidation soil is.When the length of the pile under the bottom of the pit is the same,the deeper the excavation is,the larger the ultimate uplift capacity of pile is.
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期427-432,共6页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基金 中国博士后科学基金项目(20080441232)
关键词 基坑开挖 抗拔桩 极限承载力 模型试验 excavation uplift pile ultimate capacity model test
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1ALAWNEH A S, MALKAWI A I H, AL-DEEKY H. Tension tests on smooth and rough model piles in dry sand[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(4): 746 - 753.
  • 2DASH B K, PISE P J. Effect of compressive load on upliftcapacity of model piles[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(11): 987 - 992.
  • 3黄茂松,任青,王卫东,陈峥.深层开挖条件下抗拔桩极限承载力分析[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(11):1689-1695. 被引量:65
  • 4胡琦,凌道盛,陈云敏,程泽海,冉龙.深基坑开挖对坑内基桩受力特性的影响分析[J].岩土力学,2008,29(7):1965-1970. 被引量:65
  • 5陈锦剑,王建华,范巍,王卫东.抗拔桩在大面积深开挖过程中的受力特性分析[J].岩土工程学报,2009,31(3):402-407. 被引量:50
  • 6郦建俊,黄茂松,王卫东,陈峥.开挖条件下抗拔桩承载力的离心模型试验[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(3):388-396. 被引量:24
  • 7ROBINSKY E I, MORRISON C E Sand displacement and compaction around model friction piles[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1964, 1(2): 81 - 93.
  • 8HANNA A, NGUYEN T Q. Shaft resistance of single vertical and batter piles driven in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(7): 601 - 607.
  • 9MEYERHOF G Gt. Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1976, 102(3): 195 - 228.
  • 10API recommended practice 2A-LRFD. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-load and resistance factor design[S]. 1993.

二级参考文献41

共引文献147

同被引文献135

引证文献16

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部