期刊文献+

WTO《服务贸易总协定》下报复机制之实证研究 被引量:2

An Empirical Research on WTO Retaliation under the GATS
原文传递
导出
摘要 WTO成立以来,共有三起争端涉及GATS项下的报复问题。成员对服务业实施报复的能力、GATS规则解释上的不确定性、GATS四种服务提供模式的结构、服务贸易与外国直接投资的交叉等,使报复的实际进行非常复杂。为有效实施GATS项下的报复,发展中成员必须兼顾报复之经济影响与政治影响:经济影响只是一个方面,必须重视制造政治影响,选择曝光率高且具有政治影响力的服务部门进行报复,促使发达成员执行WTO争端裁决。 Since the inception of WTO,retaliation under the GATS has been involved in three cases.The ability to retaliate under the GATS,the uncertainty of interpretation of GATS rules,four models of supply of services,the overlap of trade in services and foreign direct investment and so on complicate retaliation under the GATS.For the purpose of compelling developed members to implement WTO rulings,developing members should retaliate in those service sectors that could exert great political pressure on government to modify WTO-inconsistent measures.
作者 李晓玲
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期61-66,共6页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 中国博士后基金会项目(20090450227)
关键词 WTO 服务贸易 报复 争端解决机制 WTO trade in service retaliation dispute settlement mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Aaditya Mattoo. 1997. National Treatment in the GATS: Corner-stone or Pandora's Box [J]. Journal of world trade, 31(4): 112.
  • 2Arthur E. Appleton. 2009. Suspension of Concession in the Service Sector: Legal, Technical and Economic Problems [R]. ICTSD Dispute Settlement and Legal Aspects of International Trade. Eric H. Leroux. 2007.
  • 3Eleven Years of GATS Case Law: What Have We Learned? [J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 10 (4): 769.
  • 4John Croome. 1999. Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round [M]. Kluwer Law International: 271.
  • 5Rudolf Adlung.2006. Services Negotiations in the Doha Round: Lost in Flexibility? [J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 9(4): 869.

同被引文献49

  • 1余蕊祯.投资争端仲裁的法律适用问题-以中国双边投资条约为视角[M].仲裁研究第二十七辑,北京:法律出版社,2011:35.
  • 2Claus-Dieter Ehlermann. 2003. Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO [J]. Journal of International Economic Law. 2003, 6(3).
  • 3Federico Ortino. 2006. Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US-Gambling: A Critique [J], Journal of International Economic Law.2006, 9(1).
  • 4Isabelle Van Damme. 2009. Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body [M]. Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • 5Ian Robertson Sinclair. 1984. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties [M], Manchester Univ Pr; 2 Sub edition.
  • 6Steve Orava. 2002. Commercial reality (or lack thereof) in the Classification and Definition of Services in the WTO GATS Negotiations [J]. International Trade Law & Regulation. 2002, 8(1).
  • 7Mexico-Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services(简称 Mexico-Telecoms),DS204.
  • 8United States-Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services ( 简称 US- Gambling), DS285.
  • 9China-Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products ( 简称 China-Publications), DS363.
  • 10China-Certain Measures Affecting Electronic Payment Services (简称 China - EPS), DS413.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部