期刊文献+

2000年以来的欧盟条约改革进程--欧洲联盟宪政化进程中的曲折起伏 被引量:2

The EU Treaty Reform Process since 2000:The Highs and Lows of Constitutionalising the European Union
原文传递
导出
摘要 2000年至2008年期间,欧洲联盟付出了巨大努力以正式推进宪政化进程。基于欧洲一体化进程长期以来形成的传统,成员国在谈判《尼斯条约》的政府间会议的最后阶段首次提出了制宪这一议题,从而开启了所谓的"莱肯进程":就"欧洲的未来"展开正式而公开的辩论、设立"制宪大会",以及谈判起草一部《欧洲宪法条约》。然而,《欧洲宪法条约》遭遇否决使得整个改革计划受到质疑。经过一段时间的"反思"和重新谈判,各国政府就一部新条约达成了一致。该条约在很大程度上保留了原"宪法条约"的实质内容,但不再使用一些象征性用语。这次条约修改的成果《里斯本条约》自2009年12月1日生效。本文详尽列举了2000至2008年期间条约改革进程中的曲折起伏,提出应将欧盟的宪政化视为一个长期而渐进的过程。即使今后一段时间内不会重提通过一部欧盟宪法的正式计划,这一过程仍将继续。 The period from 2000 to 2008 has seen an extraordinary attempt to formally constitutionalise the European Union.Built on long-standing traditions within the European project,a constitutional discourse initiated in the final stages of the Intergovernmental Conference negotiating the Nice Treaty led to the so-called 'Laeken Process': the launch of a formalized,but open debate about the 'Future of Europe',the setting-up of a 'Constitutional Convention' to ratify this 'European Constitution' then threw the entire reform project into doubt.After a period of 'reflection' and subsequent re-negotiation governments agreed a new treaty that maintained much of the substance of the 'constitution',but avoided the symbolic language that it had contained.This article charts the highs and lows of this period of treaty reform,arguing that the constitutionalisation of the EU is best viewed as a long-lasting and gradual process that is set to continue even if the formal project to adopt a European Constitution will not be re-visited for some time to come.
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期133-142,共10页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1P. Norman, The Accidental Constitution-lts Origins, Negotiation and Meaning, London. John Harper Publishing, 2005.
  • 2M. Kleine, "Leadership in the European Convention", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 1227- 1248.
  • 3M. Kleine, "Leadership in the European Covention", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 1227-1248.
  • 4F. Deloche-Gaudez, Trait6 reformateur . le veto, les peuples et les mots, Retrieved October 26, 2007, http .//www. portedeurope, org/IMG/pdf/euros-du-villagefinal 1810. pdf.
  • 5E. O. Eriksen et al. , Developing a Constitution for Europe, London and New York. Routledge, 2004.
  • 6D. Panke, "More Arguing than Bargaining? The Institutional Designs of the European Convention and Intergovemmental Conferences Compared", Journal of European Integration, Vol. 28, 2006, pp. 357-379.
  • 7G. Milton et al. , The European Constitution-Its Origins, Negotiation and Meaning, London. John Harper Publishing, 2005.
  • 8C. H. Church and D. Phinnemore, Understanding the European Constitution. An lntrodution to the EU Constitutional Treaty, London and New York. Routledge, 2006.
  • 9C. Closa, "Why Convene Referendums? Explaining Choices in EU Constitutional Politics", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 1311- 1332.
  • 10丹麦.《马斯特里赫特条约》.

同被引文献56

  • 1张莉,崔杨臻.新冠疫情期间欧盟形象的“自塑”——对话理论视角下欧盟在华数字公共外交的实践与效果研究[J].欧洲研究,2021(1):49-74. 被引量:6
  • 2[法]让-吕克·南希.《解构的共通体》,上海:上海人民出版社2007年版,第11页.
  • 3[法]让·莫内.《欧洲之父--莫内回忆录》,孙慧双译,北京:国际文化出版公司1989年版,第186页.
  • 4[美]查尔斯·蒂利.《强制、资本和欧洲国家(公元990-1992年)》,魏洪钟译,上海:上海人民出版社,2007年,第18、78、109-110、112、129、64、66页.
  • 5[法]皮埃尔·热尔贝.《欧洲统一的历史与现实》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989年版,第28-51页.
  • 6[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯.《后民族结构》.曹卫东译.上海:上海人民出版社,2002年.第153页.
  • 7赵晨.协商还是博弈?——对“欧洲制宪会议”的考察[J].欧洲研究,2007,25(5):41-55. 被引量:6
  • 8Jose Ignacio Torreblanca and Mark Leonard, The Continent-Wide Rise of Euroscepticism, European Council on Foreign Relations Policy Memo, May 2013, http ://www. ecfr. eu/page/-/ECFR79_EUROSCEPTICISM_BRIEF_AW. pdf, last accessed on 4 October 2014.
  • 9Giovanni Sartofi, "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics", The American Political Science Review, Vol. 64, No.4, 1970, pp. 1033-1053.
  • 10[意]乔万尼·萨托利.“比较政治学中的概念误构”,高奇琦、景跃进主编.《比较政治中的概念问题》,北京:中央编译出版社2014年版,第35-58页.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部