期刊文献+

影响输尿管镜钬激光碎石效果的相关因素分析 被引量:7

Analysis of the correlated factors associated with the efficacy of ureteroscopic Holmium laser lithotripsy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探寻与输尿管镜钬激光碎石(URL)术中并发症发生率和碎石成功率相关的影响因素。方法对382例输尿管结石行输尿管镜钬激光碎石手术。分析这些患者的性别、年龄、结石大小、位置、嵌顿与否、手术成功率、术中并发症率和术者行URL的经验。依据术者所做URL数量多少,将术者分成4个经验组。结果总体碎石成功率91.9%,22例(5.76%)出现并发症。最有经验组与较少经验组成功率分别为94.7%和77.8%(P<0.001),并发症率分别为3.2%和22.2%(P<0.001)。嵌顿结石组与非嵌顿结石组成功率分别为79.5%和94.8%(P<0.001),并发症率分别为16.4%和3.2%(P<0.001)。性别、年龄、结石位置和大小与碎石成功率及并发症率无显著相关(P>0.05)。结论与输尿管镜钬激光碎石治疗输尿管结石的碎石成功率和并发症率相关的因素是术者的经验及结石嵌顿与否。非嵌顿结石和有经验的术者碎石成功率高,且发生并发症少。性别、年龄、结石位置和大小与碎石成功率、并发症率无显著相关。 【Objective】 To define correlated factors for success and complications for ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy procedures.【Methods】 All 382 ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy procedures were performed for ureteral calculi between 2007 and 2008.Data recorded of sex,age,stone size,stone location,impacted stone,success rate,complications and surgeon experience for this procedure were analyzed.Surgeon experience was divided into four groups based on the number of procedures performed.【Results】 Total success rate was 91.9%.Complications were present in 22 patients(5.76%).Success rate was significantly(P 0.001) related to surgeon experience,with 94.7% success in the most experienced group and 77.8% in the less experienced group and Complication rate were 3.2% versus 22.2%(P 0.001).Furthermore,Success rate for impacted versus nonimpacted were 79.5% versus 94.8%(P 0.001) and Complication rate were 16.4% versus 3.2%(P 0.001).Sex,age,stone location and size did not significantly influence complication and success rates.【Conclusion】 Surgeon experience and impaction of stone are correlated factors for success and complications for ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi.Nonimpacted stone and experienced surgeons have fewer complications and higher success rate.Sex,age,stone location and size were not significantly related to complication or success rates.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期141-144,共4页 China Journal of Endoscopy
基金 上海市浦东新区科委立项课题(PKJ2007-Y27)资助
关键词 输尿管结石 输尿管镜 钬激光 并发症 ureteroscope ureteral calculi holmium laser complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1李和明,蔡松良,赵伟平,任胜强,邬旭明.钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石疗效观察[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(8):479-480. 被引量:13
  • 2陈策,董焱鑫,高清元,钱云程,杨军昌.输尿管镜术后重症感染诊治体会(附8例报告)[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(9):949-950. 被引量:9
  • 3Ehreth JT, Drach GW,Arnett ML,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: multicenter study of kidney and upper ureters versus middle and lower ureters treatments. J Urol, 1994,152:1379-1383.
  • 4Farsi HM,Mosli HA,Alzimaity M,et al. In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for primary ureteric calculi. Urology, 1994,43:776-779.
  • 5Matin TV,Sosa RE. Shock wave lithotripsy. In :Walsh PC, Retik AB,Vaughan ED,et al. eds. Campbells Urology, vol. 3.7th ed. Philadelphia:W. B. Saunders, 1998. 2735.
  • 6Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size,and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
  • 7Pace DT,Weir MJ,Tariq N,et al. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment. J Urol,2000,164:1905-1909.
  • 8Thomas R, Macaluso JN, Vandenberg T, et al. An innovative approach to management of lower ureteral calculi. J Urol, 1993,149:1427 -1429.
  • 9Anderson KR,Keetch DW,Albala DM,et al. Optimal therapy for the distal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy. J Urol, 1994,152:62-64.
  • 10Coz F,Orvieto M, Bustos M,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of 2000 uinary calculi with the Modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol,2000,14:239.

共引文献342

同被引文献63

  • 1毛国强.输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石疗效观察[J].中外医疗,2008,27(26). 被引量:1
  • 2陈苏,陈洪波,胡晓辉,向小龙.封堵器联合输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的临床应用研究[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(5):309-310. 被引量:5
  • 3曾国华,钟文,李逊,陈文忠,何朝辉,何永忠,雷鸣,吴开俊.微创经皮肾穿刺取石术中肾盂内压变化的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(2):101-103. 被引量:155
  • 4Rabani SM,Moosavizadeh A. Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones:A Comparative Clinical Trial Between Transureteral Lithotripsy (TUL) and Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL)[J].Nephrourol Mon,2012,(03):556-559.
  • 5Sugihara T,Yasunaga H,Horiguchi H. A nomogram predicting severe adverse events after ureteroscopic lithotripsy:12 372 patients in a Japanese national series[J].{H}BJU International,2013,(03):459-466.
  • 6Cevik I,Dillioglugil O,Akdas A. Is stent placement necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for removal of impacted ureteral stones[J].{H}JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY,2010,(08):1263-1267.
  • 7Joshi HN, Karmacharya RM, Shrestha R, et al. Outcomes of extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy in renal and ureteral calculi [ J ]. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) ,2014,12 (45) :51 - 54.
  • 8Moufid K, Abbaka N, Touiti D, et al. Large impacted upper ure- teral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolitho- tripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position [J]. Urol Ann,2013,5(3) :140 -146.
  • 9Yang TK, Yang HJ, Lee LM, et al. Body mass index and buttock eireumference are independent predictors of disintegration failure in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi [ J 1. J Formos Med Assoe ,2013,112 (7) :421 - 425.
  • 10Zhu H, Ye X, Xiao X, et al. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparo- seopic approaehes to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure : a four - year retrospective study [ J ]. J Endouro1,2014,28 ( 1 ) : 100 - 103.

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部