摘要
通常,基于建筑个案的研究会因其对研究主题(如空间、构造或结构等)的限定.其研究成果虽利于学术总结.却在反馈于实践时稍显力不从心:另一方面,绝大多数个案研究沉溺于描述建成的既有效果,鲜有全面思考建筑师设计过程如何展开而促成这一结果。本文尝试以安藤忠雄的住吉长屋为研究对象.按照实践流程从微观和宏观的维度.全面地辨析何种建筑设计要素在何时获得其成立的正当性与历史独特性。
Usually, because case studies focus on the study themes, such as Space, Details or Structure, the final results are good for academic summarizing, but not so good to give advices for further practice; most case studies pay much attention on describing the built works, but they are lake of thinking on the process that how architects make decision and design uniquely. Studying on the Row House in Sumiyoshi designed by Tadao Ando, this paper tries to analyze and explain when and which design-element got its design legitimacy according to the practical process and through micro and macro scopes.
出处
《建筑师》
2011年第1期66-78,共13页
The Architect
关键词
建筑实践
设计要素
正当性
Architectural
Practice
Design-elementLegitimacy
