摘要
英美量刑听审程序呈现出量刑程序的独立型、量刑信息的开放性、量刑裁决的听证式等特征,而欧陆量刑听审程序则与之相反。在我国,构建相对独立的量刑听审程序关系着辩护方的权益保障、审判公开化改革、量刑建议试点之成效,亟需重视。在本土化路径方面,不宜选取英美国家的和欧陆学理中的独立型量刑程序,而应以中国试点的独立型量刑程序为皈依,这在改革背景、制度方案及实践效果方面均有相当的可行性支撑。
The sentencing trial in Anglo - American countries are independent, open and adversarial, which is opposite to Continental countries. In China, it is essential to set up independent sentencing procedure for safeguarding the defendant' s right, making trim into open, and supporting procuratorial organ' s power to suggest sentence. Concretely speaking, we should not learn the setencing trial pattern in Anglo - American countries and in continental scholar' s book, however, we need to generallize the tentative pattern in some China' s judicial region.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期133-140,共8页
Legal Forum
基金
笔者主持的上海市哲社规划项目<反恐与打黑的特殊诉讼程序研究>(2010EFX005)
上海市教委晨光项目(A类)<转型社会的刑事司法错误:基于实证与比较的考察>(2010CG13)之阶段成果