期刊文献+

公司丑闻、声誉机制与董事会重构 被引量:9

Corporate Scandals,Reputation Mechanism and Board Rebuild
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2003~2008年受到证监会处罚的上市公司作为研究样本,实证研究了声誉机制对公司董事会构成的影响。我们发现这些公司董事会的构成在丑闻发生前后有明显变化,尤其是董事会中独立董事所占的比例显著增加。回归结果显示,独立董事的比例与声誉惩罚之间存在显著相关性,表明发生丑闻的公司为了重建企业声誉和挽回投资者的信心,会通过增加董事会中独立董事所占的比例以加强董事会的监督职能。本文的研究结论为声誉机制的公司治理效果研究提供了经验证据,同时也拓展了董事会构成变化的研究,依此本文提出了相应的政策建议。 In this paper, the author selects listed companies as research sample which were punished by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) from 2003 to 2008, and studied whether the reputation mechanism could alter board composition. The author finds that board composition obviously changed after scandal, especially independent directors significantly increased in board. Furthermore, regression results show that firms increase independent director in board to strength supervision function in order to rebuild reputation and restore investor's confidence. The results of this study not only provide empirical evidence that reputation mechanism can improve corporate governance, but also develop the research on the composition of the board. According to the conclusion, we put forward policy recommendations.
作者 醋卫华
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期76-83,共8页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJC630140 08JC630073)的资助
关键词 公司丑闻 声誉机制 董事会构成 corporate scandals reputation mechanism board composition
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1醋卫华.声誉机制起作用了吗——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[D].厦门大学管理学院工作论文,2010a.
  • 2醋卫华.公司丑闻、声誉机制与高管变更[D].厦门大学管理学院工作论文,2010b.
  • 3黄少安,张岗.中国上市公司股权融资偏好分析[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):12-20. 被引量:972
  • 4阎达五,耿建新,刘文鹏.我国上市公司配股融资行为的实证研究[J].会计研究,2001(9):21-27. 被引量:174
  • 5邓建平,曾勇,何佳.改制模式影响董事会特征吗?[J].会计研究,2006(11):82-88. 被引量:13
  • 6Steven N.Kaplan.芝加哥大学 丑闻有利于完善公司治理[J].董事会,2005(2):100-100. 被引量:1
  • 7Adams, R., and Ferreira, D. A Theory of Friendly Boards [J]. Journal of Finance,2007(62):217-250.
  • 8Adams, R., Hermalin, B., and Weisbach, M, S. The Role of Boards of Dorectors in Corporate Governance: AConceptual Framework and Survey [J] . Journal of Economic Literature,2010(48):58-107.
  • 9Allen, F., Qian, J., and Qian, M. Law, Finance and Economic Growth in China [J] . Journal of Financial Economics,2005(77):57-116.
  • 10ArthaudDay, M. L., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., and Dalton, D. R. A Changing of the Guard: Executive and Director Turnover following Corporate Financial Restatements [J] .Academy of Management Journal, 2006(49):1119-1136.

二级参考文献24

  • 1黄速建.国有存续企业改革:问题与建议[J].经济管理,2004,30(15):6-11. 被引量:10
  • 2陆正飞.企业适度负债的理论分析与实证研究[J].经济研究,1996,31(2):52-58. 被引量:88
  • 3李增泉,孙铮,刘凤委.2004.企业绩效与薪酬契约——基于最优契约论的解释及经验证据.工作论文
  • 4Brickley, J. A. , Coles, J. L. , Jarrell. G. 1997. Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board.Journal of Corporate Finance, 3 (3) : 189 -220
  • 5Boone, A. L. , Field, L. C., Karpoff, J. M., Raheja, C. G. 2004. The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: An Empirical Analysis. WorkingPapor
  • 6Boyd, B. 1995. CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (4) : 301 -313
  • 7Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modem Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48 (3) : 831- 880
  • 8La Porta, R. , Lopez-de-Silanes, F. , Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate Ownership around in the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2) : 471-517
  • 9Lehn, K., Patro, S., Zb.ao, M. 2003. Determinants of the Size and Structure of Corporate Boards: 1935-2000. WorkingPaper
  • 10Lipton, M. , Lorsch, J. W. 1992. A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Business Lawyer, 48 (1) : 9-77

共引文献1086

同被引文献138

引证文献9

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部