论公共利益的界定与情况判决的重构

Legal Defining of the Public Interest and the Reconstitution of the Circumstantial Judgment

情况判决的核心在于公共利益和公民权益的平衡,但由于判决的适用条件中"公共利益"、"重大损失"的概念难以判断,在此前提下情况判决的实施有可能导致公共利益被滥用,公民权益也会遭到损害。为此必须从公共利益、重大损失的界定模式入手,首先由立法机关从立法上对这些概念加以界定,在此基础上司法机关在法律适用中进行解释以明确其具体界限,并且配合行政诉讼中的停止执行制度,以确保公民权益与公共利益的平衡。

The core of circumstantial judgment is the balance of the public interest and citizens＇ rights.However,some concepts applied in circumstantial judgment such as ＂public interests＂,＂major losses＂ are difficult to judge,therefore,the implementation of circumstantial judgment might lead to abuse of public interest,and citizens＇ rights might also be impaired.In order to solve these problems,we must focus on how to define ＂public interest＂ and ＂great loss＂.Firstly,the legislature should make laws to define these concepts.Secondly,the judiciary will give interpretations to confirm its specific boundary.And finally,the system of stopping executing should be used to protect the balance of the public interest and citizens＇ rights.