西方反科学思潮研究述评被引量：1

原文传递

导出

摘要作为科学思潮的对立面长期存在的反科学（anti—science）思潮是一个极其复杂的历史和文化现象。现代科学技术带给人类的负面影响使得对科学技术的质疑、批判乃至否定愈演愈烈。由此，西方反科学思潮吸引了来自各个方面的广泛关注。

作者孙红霞

机构地区中国科学院研究生院人文学院中国科学普及研究所

出处《哲学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期86-93,共8页 Philosophical Trends

关键词反科学思潮西方现代科学技术述评文化现象负面影响

参考文献43

1M. Goran, Science and Anti- Science, Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc. , 1974, preface.
2J. Passmore, Science and Its Critics , Rutgers University Press, 1975, p. 2.
3李醒民.就科学主义及反科学主义答客问[J].科学文化评论,2004,1(4):94-106. 被引量：11
4霍耳顿.《科学与反科学》,范岱年等译,江西教育出版社,1999,第183页;第190-191页.
5P. Forman, "The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodemity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology," History and Technology, 2007, Vol. 23, pp. 1 - 152.
6舍格斯特尔.《超越科学大战--科学与社会关系中迷失了的话语》,黄颖等译.中国人民大学出版社,2006,第117-118页;第97-98页;第51-52页;第114页.
7U. Segerstrale, Defenders of the Truth: The Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate, Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 333.
8W. R Brain, "Science and Antiscience," Science, 1965, Vol. 148 No. 3667, pp. 192 -198.
9N. Wade, "Science and Its Critics: Must Rationality Be ltatloneo. Sc/ence, 1974, p. 925.
10E. Ashby, "The Bemal Lecture," 1971 : Science and Antiscience, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Series Biological Sciences, 1971, Vol. 178, No. 1050, pp. 29-42.

1[1]Ben-David, J. (1980). The Ethos of Science: The Last Half-Century. in J. R. Philips and T. J.Conlon(ed.), Science and Polity. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
2[2]Ben-David, J. (1984 (1971)). The Scientist′s Role in Society. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3[3]Ben-David, J. (1986). Academic Market, Ideology and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge:Physiology in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Germany. in Siegwart Lindberg, James S. Coleman,and Stefan Nowak(ed.), Approaches to Social Theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4[4]Ben-David, J. and Collins, R. (1966). A Comparative Study of Academic Freedom and Student Politics. Comparative Education Review. 10 (2): 220-49.
5[5]Bernal, J. D. (1939). The Social Function of Science. London: Routledge.
6[6]Beyerchen, A. D. (1977). Scientists under Hitler: Politics and the Physics Community in the Third Reich. New Haven: Yale University Press.
7[7]Bush, V. (1945). Science the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office.
8[8]Carson, R. (1962). The Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9[9]Forman, P. (1971). Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. 3:1-115.
10[10]Gay, P. (1968). Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider. New York: Harper and Row.

1赵琦,徐平川,李勇强,蒋亚欣.HPS理念下初中物理法线概念的建构与反思[J].中学物理教学参考,2020(29):6-8.
2李醒民.论科学中的精英主义[J].社会科学论坛,2010(1):4-13. 被引量：2
3吕乃基.文化对科学的制约与引导[J].江苏社会科学,1995(3):66-70. 被引量：5
4徐艳玲.多维视角中的社会主义[J].科学社会主义,2001(1):9-13.
5马向真.科学家越轨行为的多维分析与道德防范[J].学海,2004(6):83-87.
6马来平.与SSK对话:中国科技哲学的前沿课题[J].哲学动态,2002(12):2-6. 被引量：3
7吕乃基.科学的代价[J].自然辩证法研究,1995,11(12):18-22.
8黄瑞雄,邹顺宏.从SSK科学观的演进看STS的实践化转向[J].科学技术与辩证法,2005,22(6):49-53. 被引量：8
9李小博,朱丽君.科学社会学与科学修辞学[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(1):47-52. 被引量：4
10刘兵,章梅芳.科学史中“内史”与“外史”划分的消解——从科学知识社会学的立场看[J].清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2006,21(1):132-138. 被引量：26

1丹皮尔.《科学史及其与哲学和宗教的关系》,李珩译,广西师范大学出版社,2001,第78页.
2.《马克思恩格斯选集》第2卷[M].人民出版社,1972年5月第1版.第86页.
3林德伯格.《西方科学的起源》[M].中国对外翻译出版公司,2001年版.第374页.
4怀特海：《科学与近代世界》，商务印书馆1959年版，第94页
5G. B. Ferngren (ed.), Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, the John Hopkins University Press, 2002, p. 48, p. 50.
6贝克尔.《启蒙时代哲学家的天城》,何兆武译,江苏教育出版社,2005,第7页.
7巴罗.《不论-科学的极限与极限的科学》,李新洲等译,上海科学技术出版社,2000,第13-15页.
8魏因伯格.《科学、信仰与政治-弗兰西斯·培根与现代世界的乌托邦根源》,张新樟译,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008,第45页;第43页.
9P. Harrison, "Curiosity, Forbidden Knowledge, and the Reformation of Natural Philosophy in Early Modern England", Isis, Vol. 92, 2001, p. 267, p. 269, p. 270.
10D. C. Lindberg, R.L. Numbers ( ed. ), When Science and Christianity Meet, The University of Chicago Press, 2003 pp. 11 - 12.

哲学动态

2011年第3期

内容加载中请稍等...