期刊文献+

劳动争议案件的证据审查与判断

The Proof Investigation and Judgment for Working Dispute Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在劳动争议案件中,劳动者收集、保存证据的能力明显不足。基层人民法院在审查与判断时,必须考虑劳动关系的特殊性,坚持司法能动性理念,发挥审判权的能动性,认真审查证据属性,合理分配举证责任,如此劳动争议案件裁判才能达到"两个效果"的统一。 The worker is lack of ability to collect and preserve the proof in the working dispute cases. The grass - root court must consider the special characteristic of working relationship, insist the principle of initiative, play the role of initiative judgment, investigate the proof's attribute seriously, and allot the responsibilities of proving reasonably when the grass root court investigates and judges. If so, we can achieve the unification of two effects in the process of dealing with working dispute cases.
作者 詹安乐
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《天津市工会管理干部学院学报》 2011年第1期32-34,共3页 Journal of Tianjin Trade Union Administrators’ College
关键词 劳动争议案件 证据审查与判断 法院审判权 working dispute cases the proof investigation and judgment the court~ right to judge
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献3

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部