摘要
国内学界尚无统一的过度劳动程度测定标准和体系,这阻碍了过度劳动研究的进展。构建评定体系,应以过度劳动的内涵及其构成要件为基础,遵循劳动者的疲劳状态和工作状态两大维度。疲劳的衡量指标、"过劳死"的病理征兆和工作状态的评定内容,为过度劳动评定体系提供了衡量指标的"内容内核",而日本的疲劳积蓄度自测量表则提供了结构框架和等级评定依据。
There isn' t a unified assessment standard and system of karoshi in the academic circle of our country, which hinders the development of karoshi. Constructing the system for the assessment of karoshi should be based on the connotation and constituent elements of overwork and follow the two dimensions of the fatigue and working status of laborers. The assessment indexes of overwork, the patho- logical symptoms of " Karoshi" and working status are the "core contents" of the indexes of assessment system. Japanese fatigue degree self- test scale provides a framework and grading basis.
出处
《经济经纬》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期86-90,共5页
Economic Survey