期刊文献+

我国义务教育生产效率及其影响因素研究 被引量:5

On the Disparity of China's Compulsory Educational Productivity and Its Influence
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用中国教育财政科学研究所2007年"中国农村义务教育状况调查"所获数据,采用数据包络分析(DEA)、托比特模型等计量方法对我国义务教育生产效率进行了实证研究。数据包络分析模型的效率评价和回归分析结果显示:(1)我国中东部义务教育生产效率并不理想,学校办学效率存在较大提升空间;(2)不同地区、城乡、教育阶段以及类型的学校都存在效率差异;(3)政府对学校的管理程度和校际间的竞争氛围对义务教育阶段学校的教育生产效率具有显著影响。 This paper adopts the data of "China's Rural Compulsory Education Survey" launched by China's Education Finance Research Institute in 2007 and does an empirical research on China's compulsory educational productivity through the DEA model,Tobit model and other statistical methods.The results are that compulsory educational productivity in the middle-eastern area of China is not satisfactory and it is a feasible way to improve school operation efficiency;there are large differences in different regions,urban-rural areas,different stages of education and different school types in efficiency scores;and the degree of school management from government and the atmosphere of school competition have a significant role in improving the educational resource productivity of schools on the stage of compulsory education.
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期19-23,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目"义务教育生产效率研究"(71003071)的阶段性成果
关键词 义务教育 教育生产效率 compulsory education educational productivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1张宁,胡鞍钢,郑京海.应用DEA方法评测中国各地区健康生产效率[J].经济研究,2006,41(7):92-105. 被引量:170
  • 2Yongmei Hu, Zhi Zhang & Wenyan Liang. (2009). Efficiency of primary schools in Beijing, China: an evaluation by data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 34-50.
  • 3Coelli T. (2005). An Introduction to efficiency and Productivity Analysis (2th edition ). USA:Springer Science Business Media Inc.
  • 4Pastor J. T, Ruiz J. L. & Sirvent I. (1999). A statistical test for detecting influential observations in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 542- 554.
  • 5Ray S. C. ( 1991 ). Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connectieut Data. Management Science. Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 1620-1628.
  • 6Kirjavainen T, Loikkanent HA. (1998). Efficiency differences of finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 17, No. 4 ,pp. 377-394.
  • 7Barrow M Economics Cooper S. ( 1991 ). Measuring local education authority performance : A frontier approach. of Education Review. Vol. 10 ,no. 1, pp. 19-27.
  • 8T. & COHN E. (1997). Estimation of a Frontier Production Function for the South Carolina Educational Process. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 313-327.
  • 9Bessent A. & Bessent W. (1980). Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis. Educational Adminstriation Quarterly. Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 57-75.
  • 10Ludwin W. G. & Guthrie T. L. (1989). Assessing Productivity with Data Envelopment Analysis. Public Productivity Review. Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 361-372.

共引文献53

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部