WTO争端解决中的专家意见被引量：2

Expert Advice in WTO Dispute Settlement

下载PDF

导出

摘要由于WTO争端解决的技术性和法律性日益强烈,专家意见受到了重视。专家组、上诉机构都可以发表或者接受专家意见。专家组拥有任命专家的权利,相关国际组织在其中发挥了重要作用。专家意见的作用在于解释事实,发表个人观点,本质上没有法律约束力,但它对案件的裁决具有影响力。有关专家意见的判断标准,可以依据所涉问题的实质法律标准、举证责任和审查标准予以分析。 Since the WTO dispute settlement becomes more technical and has been legalized, expert advice in WTO dispute settlement is of great importance. During this process, the Panel,dispute parties and the Appellate Body may deliver or receive the expert advice. The panel has the power to appoint experts, with the cooperation of relevant international organizations. Expert advice is limited to the explanation of the facts, so is personal opinion and essentially non-binding, but may indirectly influence the results of the case. In judging the expert advice, we may consider two elements： the substantial legal criteria at issue, rules on burden of proof and standard of review.

作者叶波陈靓

机构地区上海WTO事务咨询中心博士后工作站上海WTO事务咨询中心

出处《世界贸易组织动态与研究（上海对外贸易学院学报）》 2011年第2期43-47,共5页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

关键词专家意见法律效力审查标准举证责任 expert advice legal force review standard burden of proof

分类号 D996.1 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1《SPS协定》第5条第1款.
2平觉,白巴根.WTO争端解决程序的适用规则--多边环境保护公约能否成为适用规则[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究（上海对外贸易学院学报）,2010,17(5):57-69. 被引量：1
3DSU第17条第6款.
4Appellate Body Report, EC-Asbestos, WT/DS135/AB/R,para.52.3(f).
5Appellate Body Report, EC-Asbestos, WT/DS 135/AB/R,para.52.7(c).
6《SPS协定》第11条第2款.
7DSUI附录4第4条.
8WTC Doc.WT/DSB/RC/1,11 Deccembet 1996.
9Rule of Conduct for the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes,WT/DSB/RC/I, 11 December 1996.
10DSU附录4第6条.

二级参考文献56

1Pauwelyn,J.(2001),"The Role of public International Law in the WTO:How far Can We Go?",AmericanJournal of International Law,2001,95:535-578.-(2003),Conflict of Norms in Public International Law:How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law.-(2004),Remarks by Joost Pauwelyn,in the Panel on the Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization.ASIL Proceedings,2004,135.-(2005),The Application of Non-WTO Rules of International Law in WTO Dispute Settlement,in Patrick F.J.Macrory,Arthur E.Appleton and Michael G.Plummer(eds.),The World Trade Organization:Legal,Economic and Political Analysis,Vol.1,Springer Publishing,2005.
2Trachtman,Joel P.(1999),"The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution",Harv.Int'l L.J.,1999(40):333.-(2004),Remarks by Joel P.Trachtman,in the Panel on the Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization.ASIL Proceedings,2004:139.-(2005),Jurisdiction in WTO dispute settlement,in Rufus Yerxa & Bruce Wilson(eds.),Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement:The First Ten Years,2005:134.
3Marceau,Gabrielle(1999),A Call for Coherence in International Law,Praises for the Prohibition Against"Clinical Isolation"in WTO Dispute Settlement,Journal of World Trade,1999,33(5):87.-(2001),Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions,The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and Other Treaties,Journal of World Trade,2001,35(6):1081.
4Bartels,L.(2001),"Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings",Journal of World Trade,2001,35(3):499-519.
5Lindroos,A.,and Michael Mehling(2005),"Dispelling the Chimera of'Self-Contained Regimes':International law and the WTO",Eur.J.INT'L L.,2005,16(5):857-860.
6Palmeter,D.& Petros C.Mavroidis(2004),Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization:Practice and Procedure(2nd ed).Cambridge University Press,2004.
7岩泽雄司(2003).WTO争端解决机制的国际法意义与特征,日本国际法的百年(九)争端解决.国际法学会,2001:第215页以下,以及法学家,2003年第1254号.
8奥胁直也.现代国际法与国际裁判的法律功能-国际社会的法制化与国际法的碎片化[J].法学教室,2004,281.
9WTO, MATRIX, On Trade Measures Pursuant to Selected Mu/tilateral Envirmmental Agreements. WT/CTS/W/160/Rev.4. TN/TE/S/5/Rev.2.14, March 2007.
10DSU第6条.

共引文献1

1胡加祥.WTO公力救济权之重构[J].法学,2009(7):55-65. 被引量：3

同被引文献21

1Geoffrey Antell, James W. Coleman, "An Empirical Analysis of Wealth Disparities in WTO Disputes: Do Poorer Countries Suffer from Strategic Delay during Dispute Litigation" ?Boston University lnternational Law Journal, 2011, 29: 275.
2Robert Hudec, Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modem GA TT Legal System, New Hampshire: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 199.3:213.
3John H. Jackson, William J. Davey & Alan O. Sykes, Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text, West Publishing Company 5th ed. 2008:272.
4Kristin Bohl, "prob!ems of Developing Country Access t? WTO Dispute Settlement" , Chicago-KentJournM of International & Comparative Law, 2009, 9:146.
5EC-Approval and Marketing Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R,paras. 7.18-7.20.
6Chad P. Pown & Bernard M. Hoekman, "WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector" , Journal of International Economic Law, 2005, 8: 861-862.
7Joost Pauwelyn, "The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement" , International & Comparative Law Quaterly, 2002, 51: 325.
8KristinBohl, "Problems of Developing Country Access to WTO Dispute Settlement" , Chicago-KentJournal of Intemational & ComparativeLaw, 2009, 9:148.
9Asif H. Qureshi: "lntenaational Trade for DeveloPment: The WTO as a Development Institution?" Journal of World Trade, 2009, 43(1 ): 179.
10Gregory Shaffer, How to Make the WTO Dispute Settlement System Work for Developing Countries." Some Proactive Developing country Strategies, ICTSD Resource Paper,2003,5: 18-20.