期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结直肠癌临床效果比较的Meta分析 被引量:69

Comparison between Effects of Laparoscopy and Open Surgery on Colorectal Cancer:A Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜手术(LS)与开腹手术(OS)治疗结直肠癌的临床效果。方法检索1991年1月—2010年7月公开发表的LS与OS治疗结直肠癌的随机对照试验(RCT)文献,根据入选标准筛选文献,提取有关临床效果指标进行Meta分析。结果按照筛选标准,共有14篇RCT共计5 478例结直肠癌患者纳入分析。LS组与OS组患者基本特征均衡。LS组术中出血量较OS组减少125 m l(P<0.001),手术时间延长42 m in(P<0.001),肿瘤直径、淋巴结检出数量、纵向切缘阳性率和环周切缘阳性率两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);LS组术后并发症切口感染、麻痹性肠梗阻的发生率以及围术期病死率均较OS组明显降低(P<0.001),其他并发症间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。远期疗效如3年生存率、5年生存率、局部复发和远处转移两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但LS组穿刺孔肿瘤种植较OS组切口肿瘤种植的发生率明显增高(P=0.04)。结论 LS创伤小,可安全地根治结直肠癌,远期效果与OS无差异。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery(LS) and open surgery(OS) on colorectal cancer.Methods Randomized controlled trial(RCT) reports on LS and OS for colorectal cancer published from January 1991 to 2010 were retrieved and relevant clinical effect indexes extracted,based on inclusion criteria,to perform Meta-analysis.Results A total of 14 RCT reports(5 478 colorectal cancer patients) were included in this study.The basic features of 2 groups were balanced.Blood loss of LS group was lower by 125 ml than that of OS group(P0.001),operative time longer by 42 min(P0.001),no significant difference was noted in tumor size,detection of lymph nodes,positive rate of longitudinal or circumferential resection margin between 2 groups.Incidence of such complications as postoperative infection and paralytic ileus,perioperative mortality were significantly lower in group LS than in group OS(P0.001),but no difference in other complications.There was not significant difference in 3-year survival,5-year survival,local recurrence or distant metastasis,but incidence of puncture neoplasm seeding higher in LS group than in OS group(P=0.04).Conclusion LS,with fewer operative wounds,can cure colorectal cancer safely and radically,not differing from OS in long-term effect.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期510-515,共6页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜 随机对照试验 META分析 Colorectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Randomized controlled trial Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy) [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, 1 (3) : 144 - 150.
  • 2王炜,刘斌,杨志明.经内镜注墨定位在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的应用[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(5):375-376. 被引量:14
  • 3王云霞,屈清荣,张豫峰.低位直肠癌腹腔镜改良Bacon′s手术30例的术后护理[J].中国误诊学杂志,2009,9(20):4926-4927. 被引量:6
  • 4Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : short - term outcomes of a randomised trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2005, 6 (7): 477-484.
  • 5Lacy AM, Garcia - Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy - assisted eolectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non - metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 2002, 359 (9325) : 2224 - 2229.
  • 6杜萍,刘丽霞,谢艳,张杰.腹腔镜手术的配合及体会[J].河北医药,2008,30(6):780-780. 被引量:6
  • 7Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary [ J ]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17 (1): 1-12.
  • 8Stage JG, Schulze S, Moiler P, et al. Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma [J]. Br J Surg, 1997, 84 (3): 391-396.
  • 9Sehwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 1998, 383 (1): 49-55.
  • 10Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopie versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1998, 187 (1): 46-55.

二级参考文献8

共引文献21

同被引文献568

引证文献69

二级引证文献636

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部