试论刑事裁判与民意冲突的司法程序内解决

On Judicial Resolution of Conflicts between Criminal Rulings and the Public Opinion

以"沟通"取代"隔离"已经成为目前解决多发的刑事裁判与民意冲突问题的共识性思路。将刑事裁判与民意冲突纳入司法程序,无疑是最为常规、最为规范、效力最为显著的方式,与现有解决方式相比,司法方式在规范地解决冲突、和平地解决冲突,以及增强冲突处理结果的共识性等方面都具有明显的优势。因而可以在突破与更新传统刑事诉权理论与刑事司法民主理论的前提下,从适用案件范围、诉讼方式、程序启动的期间和理由以及受理法院、程序的进行、刑事裁判的效力、判后答疑机制等方面建构民意表达程序。

It becomes the common way of thinking that we should replace isolation by communication to resolve the conflicts between criminal rulings and the public opinion.It is undoubted that the judicial way is the most common,most normal way which has the striking effect.Compared with the current resolving way,judicial way has notable advantages such as resolving conflicts normally and peacefully,and reinforcing consensus about resolving results.Therefore we can construct the procedure of expression of the public opinion from the application domain,the action way,the time limit of opening,reasons and courts,process of the procedure,effect of the criminal rulings and question-answer system after ruling,on the premise of breakthrough and renew the traditional theory of criminal action rights and criminal judicial democracy.