摘要
作为无限者的道,通过一个有限化以达确定化的过程完成其自我实现,这同时造成了作为"观念结果"的物,与作为"观物要求"的成心两种结果。成心观物,固不免有种种不牢靠的是非之论发生出来,但并不能根绝真实之是非的可能。即便全然为"假是非",其中亦必有是非的必然之理的真实表现;更何况,对于是非、善恶,良知可以获得一种确知,而是非的必然之理与良知之良,都被道的至善性所保证,这就使得要把一切是非之论一概无谓化的论说难有成立的余地。
Through a defining process, the unlimited way has accomplished itself and created the matter as "the fruits of ideas" and the prejudice as "the demand for observing the matter" simultaneously. To observe the matter with prejudice inevitably raises unreliable disputes, the existence of real disputes. Even all the "disputes are unreal," but it could not eradicate the possibility of there should be a real expression of the principle of disputes. There is no need to say that to identify yes or no, benevolence or evil, the intuitive knowledge could acquire a confirmation, while the perfectness of the way guarantees the natural principle of disputes and the goodness of the intuitive knowledge, which leaves no room for the argument holding yes or no all the same.
出处
《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期11-22,共12页
Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition