期刊文献+

口腔颌面部肿瘤患者营养风险筛查和营养治疗 被引量:13

Nutritional risk screening and enteral nutrition in patients with oral and maxillofacial cancers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:运用营养风险筛查(NRS2002)对口腔颌面部肿瘤患者进行营养风险筛查,评估NRS2002在口腔颌面部肿瘤患者中的应用情况;同时对筛查出具有营养风险的患者进行肠内营养治疗,观察治疗效果。方法:收集59例口腔颌面部肿瘤住院患者为研究对象,询问病史、近期进食情况及体重变化情况,测量身高、体重,并测定血红蛋白、淋巴细胞计数、血清白蛋白和前白蛋白。参照NRS2002对患者的具体要求,在手术前和手术后1d及7d分别对患者进行营养风险筛查。将术后筛查出有营养风险的患者随机分为实验组与对照组,进行营养干预。比较营养治疗7d后各项生化指标的变化。采用SPSS11.5软件包对结果进行t检验和χ2检验。结果:术前患者营养风险的检出率为27.1%,术后1d则提高到71.2%。与术前相比,术后营养风险显著上升(P<0.05),且患者血红蛋白、淋巴细胞计数、血清白蛋白、前白蛋白在术后均有显著下降(P<0.01)。营养干预前,实验组与对照组营养生化指标无显著性差异(P>0.05);营养干预7d后,对照组患者血液生化指标中除血红蛋白略有下降外,淋巴细胞计数、血清白蛋白、前白蛋白较干预前略有上升,其中前白蛋白显著升高(P<0.05)。实验组患者血液生化指标除血红蛋白略有下降外,淋巴细胞计数、血清白蛋白、前白蛋白较干预前均显著提高(P<0.05);营养干预后,再次进行营养风险筛查发现,与对照组相比,实验组干预后的NRS2002评分显著下降(P<0.05)。结论:NRS2002能方便、快捷地反映口腔颌面部肿瘤住院患者手术前的营养风险,且术后有针对性的营养治疗能显著提高患者的营养状况,减少感染性并发症,改善预后。 PURPOSE: To screen the nutritional risk of patients with oral and maxillofacial cancers using NRS2002 and evaluate the clinical usefulness of NRS2002.Meanwhile,nutritional support was given after screening and the effect was evaluated.METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with oral and maxillofacial cancers were enrolled in this study.The medical history and the intake condition of all patients were recorded,body weight and height were measured.The serum hemoglobin(Hb),lymphocyte count(LC),albumin(Alb),pre-albumin(PA) of the patients were detected.According to the requirements of NRS2002,the patients were screened before and after surgery.The patients with nutritional risks were divided into experimental group and control group randomly.The blood biochemical parameters in the two groups were compared after nutritional intervention.The data was analyzed by student's t test and Chi-square test with SPSS11.5 software package.RESULTS: Nutritional risk pre-operatively was 27.1% while the figure increased to 71.2% after operation(P﹤0.05).Compared to pre-operation,nutritional risk increased significantly.Hb,LC,Alb and PA decreased significantly(P﹤0.01).Before nutritional intervention,there was no difference of the biochemical stats between the patients in the experimental group and the control group(P﹤0.05).After 7 days' treatment,the biochemical parameters except Hb and PA increased significantly in the control group.In the experimental group,LC,Alb and PA increased significantly(P〉0.05),especially Alb(P﹤0.01),but Hb decreased.Compared with the control group,the NRS 2002 score decreased significantly in the experimental group after nutritional intervention.CONCLUSIONS: NRS2002 can reflect the nutritional risk of the patients with oral and maxillofacial cancers conveniently and swiftly.Nutritional support after operation can significantly increase the nutritional status of the patients,reduce the infectious complications and improve the prognosis.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2011年第1期101-105,共5页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词 营养风险筛查2002 口腔颌面部肿瘤 营养状况 营养治疗 Nutritional risk screening2002 Oral and maxillofacial cancer Nutritional status Nutritional support
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bassett MR, Dobie RA. Patterns of nutritional deficiency in head and neck cancer[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 1983 , 91 (1) : 119-125.
  • 2Brookes GB. Nutritional status prognostic indicator in head and neck cancer [J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 1985,93 (1) :69- 74.
  • 3Wood RM. Nutrition and the head and neck cancer patient[J]. Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol , 1989 , 68(4) :391-395.
  • 4Donaldson SS , Lenon RA. Alterations of nutritional status : Impact of chemotherapy and radiation therapy[J]. Cancer , 1979 , 43(5) :2036-2052.
  • 5Detsky AS, Mclaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? [J].JPEN,1987,11(1):8-13.
  • 6肠外肠内营养学临床指南系列一——住院患者肠外营养支持的适应证(草案)[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(10):591-594. 被引量:28
  • 7Corish CA, Flood P, Kennedy NP. Comparison of nutritional risk screening tools in patients on admission to hospital [J]. J Hum Nutr Diet, 2004,17(2):133-139.
  • 8Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002[J] .Clin Nutr, 2003, 22 (4) :4152-4211.
  • 9国际生命科学学会中国办事处中国肥胖问题工作组联合数据汇总分析协作组.中国成人体质指数分类的推荐意见简介[J].中华预防医学杂志,2001,35(5):349-350. 被引量:1038
  • 10陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:216

二级参考文献28

  • 1孙建琴,张美芳,刘景芳,汪毓诚,陈艳秋,韩维嘉,杨青,范青,冯颖,沈雅英,蔡丽英,陈霞飞.住院老年病人营养不良及其对并发症的影响[J].肠外与肠内营养,2005,12(6):345-348. 被引量:35
  • 2Bruce RS, Blackburn GL, Joseph Vitale, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in general medical patients [J]. JAMA,1976, 235(4): 1567-1570
  • 3McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital [J]. BMJ, 1994, 308:945-948
  • 4Saletti A, Johansson L, Yifter-Lindgren E. Nutritional status and a 3-year follow-up in elderly receiving support at home[J]. Gerontology, 2005, 51(3):192-198
  • 5Planas M, Audivert S, Perez-Portabella C, et al. Nutritional status among adult patients admitted to an university-affiliated hospital in Spain at the time of genoma [J]. Clin Nutr, 2004, 23(5):1016-1024
  • 6Kondrup J, Rasmussen H, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials [J]. Clin Nutr, 2003,22 ( 3 ) :321-336
  • 7Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002 [J]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(4):415-421
  • 8中华医学会编辑出版部.法定计量单位在医学上的应用(第2版)[M].北京:人民军医出版社,1998.37.
  • 9Rapp-Kesek D, Stahle E, Karlsson TT, et al. Body mass index and albumin in the preoperative evaluation of cardiac surgery patients [J]. Clin Nutr, 2004, 23(6):1398-1404
  • 10Arnaud-Battandier F, Malvy D, Jeandel C. Use of oral supplements in malnourished elderly patients living in the community: a pharmaco-economic study [J]. Clin Nutr,2004, 23(5):1096-1103

共引文献1316

同被引文献130

引证文献13

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部