期刊文献+

法官量刑裁量权的合理规制——基于《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》的分析

Reasonable Regulations Relative to Judges' Sentencing Discretion:Based on Analysis of Sentencing Guidelines of the People's Court(for Trial Implementation)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国在2010年10月1日实施的《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》和《人民法院量刑程序指导意见(试行)》明确了检察官的量刑建议权,确立了相对独立的量刑程序和判决书的说理性要求,但对量刑信息的收集机制、量刑程序的证明的特殊性及建议权的变更问题没有规定,就此提出相应的解决措施。 Sentencing Guidelines of the People's Court (for Trial Implementation) and Sentencing Procedures Guidelines of the People's Court (for Trial Implementation), both of which came into effect on October 1, 2010, present a clear definition of procurators' fight to sentencing recommendation, an establishment of relatively independent sentencing procedures and a request for reasoning in the sentencing judgment. However, there is no regulation mentioned about a mechanism for collecting sentencing information, about the particularity of proving sentencing procedures, or the change of the right to sentencing recommendation. Accordingly, the article comes up with corresponding solutions.
作者 刘菁
出处 《北京政法职业学院学报》 2011年第1期22-25,共4页 Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词 量刑裁量权 量刑建议权 权力规制 sentencing discretion fight to sentencing recommendation authoritative regulations
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

共引文献191

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部