期刊文献+

产能利用不足和通胀压力并存的悖论——从产能角度思考中国经济的深层次问题及对策

The Paradox in the Coexistence of Insufficient Capacity Utilization and Inflation Pressure——Chinese Economy's Deep-Seated Problems from the Perspective of Overcapacity and the Countermeasures
原文传递
导出
摘要 从中国经济运行的实证轨迹来看,产能过剩存在于以钢铁等为代表的中上游工业制造业和以部分机械制造行业为代表的中下游工业制造业,近年来在以高速公路、高速铁路和轨道交通为代表的基础设施行业也有所体现。在产能过剩的同时,中国的通胀压力尤其是生产资料价格上涨压力却难以消减。产能利用不足与通胀压力并存的根源值得深入分析。生产要素价格偏低且定价机制不合理、投资和消费需求结构失衡、企业在产能过剩情况下仍有利可图、投资的行业结构不尽合理以及投资主体结构失衡是造成这种现象的重要成因,其中投资结构和主体失衡是核心的深层次原因。 According to the moving track of Chinese economy, overcapaeity extensively exists in up-and-mid-stream manufacturing, represented by steel industry, and in mid-and-down-stream manufacturing, represented by part of machinery manufacturing. In recent years, overcapacity has emerged in infrastructure industry, such as express way, high speed railway and track transportation. At the same time of overcapacity, the inflation pressure in China, especially upward pressure on prices of means of production, is hard to eliminate. It is valuable to deeply analyze the root of the phenomenon that insufficient capacity utilization and inflation pressure coexist. The main causes resulting in such phenomenon include relatively low prices of production factors and unreasonable pricing mechanism, unbalanced structure of investment and consumer demand, abnormal profitability of enterprises in industries with overcapacity, irrational industrial structure of investment and unbalanced investor structure. Among them, the imbalance of investment structure and investors is the most deep-seated cause.
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期15-25,共11页 Finance Forum
关键词 产能过剩 通胀压力 投资结构 投资主体 制度创新 overcapacity inflation pressure investment structure investor mechanism innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

  • 1傅勇,张晏.中国式分权与财政支出结构偏向:为增长而竞争的代价[J].管理世界,2007,23(3):4-12. 被引量:1745
  • 2张军,高远,傅勇,张弘.中国为什么拥有了良好的基础设施?[J].经济研究,2007,42(3):4-19. 被引量:1054
  • 3周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):36-50. 被引量:5708
  • 4平新乔.2006:《中国地方预算体制的绩效评估及指标设计》,工作论文No.C2006018,北大中国经济研究中心.
  • 5Alesina A., F. R. Campante and G. Tabellini , 2008, "Why is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclical?", Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1006-1036.
  • 6Andersen A. L. and L. H. W. Nielsen, 2007, "Fiscal Transparency and Procyclical Fiscal Policy", Working Paper, University of Copenhagen.
  • 7Arellano M. and S. Bond, 1991, "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", Review of Economic Sudies, 58,277-297.
  • 8Blundell R. and S. Bond, 1998,"Initial Conditions and Moments Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models", Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115- 143.
  • 9Bond S. ,2002, "Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice", Working Paper,09/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.
  • 10Catao L. A. and W. S. Bennett, 2002,"Sovereign Defaults: The Role of Volatility", IMF Working Papers 02/149.

共引文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部