期刊文献+

中国不良贷款回收率地区差异的原因分析 被引量:14

Analysis of reasons for the regional difference of recovery rate of China's NPL
原文传递
导出
摘要 在中国不同省份的不良贷款回收率水平之间存在较大的差异.通过构造一系列能够刻画各省的经济发展水平和市场化程度的指标,较好地解释了环境因素对地区回收率差异的影响.研究结果表明:不同地区在经济发展水平、要素市场发育程度、法律环境和中介组织发育程度、非国有经济发展程度、政府干预程度等因素的差异能够比较好地解释其回收率之间的差异,而且2001年至2005年各省的不良贷款回收率差异的逐渐变小也是由于这些因素的趋同造成的.基于这些指标,将回收率水平接近的省份划分到相同的区域,为不良贷款的分区域回收率建模奠定基础. In China, there exists a big difference in recovery rate of non-performing loans between provinces. By constructing a series of indicators which represent the economic development and marketization level of every province, the differences between the provinces' recovery rate can be explained. The results show that the differences between the indicators, such as per capita GDP, development of factor markets, legal environment and intermediary organizations and non-state economy, and degree of government intervention, can well explain the differences in recovery rate between provinces. Further, the authors explain why the differences in recovery rate between provinces became smaller from 2001 to 2005 are given. Based on these indicators, the authors divided the provinces with close recovery rate into the same cluster, which would lay the foundation for disposal of non-performing loan recovery and risk management beyond provinces.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期438-449,共12页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家973计划(2007CB814902) 国家自然科学基金(70933003)
关键词 回收率 经济发展水平 市场化程度 主成分 聚类分析 recovery rate economic strength marketization level principal component cluster analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hurt L, Felsovalyi A. Measuring loss on Latin American defaulted bank loans, a 27-year study of 27 countries[J]. Journal of Lending and Credit Risk Management, 1998, 80:41- 46.
  • 2La Porta R, Lopez-desilanes F, Zamarripa G. Related lending[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 2: 231- 268.
  • 3Gupton G, Stein R. LossCalc: Moody's model for predicting loss given default (LGD)[R]. Moody's Investor Service, February 2002.
  • 4Frye J. Collateral damage: A source of systematic credit risk[J]. Risk Magazine, 2000(21): 188 -203.
  • 5Frye J. Depressing recoveries[J]. Risk, 2000(13): 108- 111.
  • 6Querci F. Loss given default on a medium-sized Italian bank's loans: An empirical exercise[J/OL]. The European Financial Management Association, Genoa, Genoa University, 2005. htt p://www.efmaefm.org/efma2OO5/papers/206-querci_paper.pdf.
  • 7叶晓可,刘海龙.银行不良贷款违约损失率结构特征研究[J].上海管理科学,2006,28(6):12-15. 被引量:21
  • 8樊纲,王小鲁.中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2007.
  • 9陈暮紫.基于广义BETA回归的不良贷款回收率模型[R].Working Paper,2009.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Acharya,Bharath and Srinivasan.Understanding the Recovery Rates on Defaulted Securities.Working paper.2003(9).
  • 2[2]Altman,E and V Kishore.Almost everything you wanted to know about recovery on defaulted bonds.Financial Analyst's Journal,1996,(6):57-64.
  • 3[3]Asarnow,Elliot and David Edwards.Measuring loss on defaulted bank loans:a 24-year study.Journal of Commercial Lending.1995,77 (7):11-23.
  • 4[4]Basel Committee,New Basel Capital Accord CP3,April.2003.
  • 5[5]Carty and Lieberman.Defaulted bank loan recoveries.Moody's Special Comment,1996:1-12.
  • 6[6]Dermine and Carvalho.Bank loan losses-Given-Default,A case study.Working paper.2005.3
  • 7[7]Eales,R and Bosworth.Severity of loss in the event of default in small business and larger consumer loans.Journal of Lending & Credit Risk Management,1998,27 (4):58-65.
  • 8[8]Gupton,Gates and Carty.Bank-loan loss given default.Moody's Investor's Service,Global Credit Research,November,2000:1-24.
  • 9[9]Gupton and Roger.LossCalc:Moody's Model for Predicting Loss Given Default(LGD).Moody's White paper.2005.2

共引文献20

同被引文献167

引证文献14

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部