期刊文献+

纪律的限度:以涂尔干与福柯的教育理论为视角 被引量:5

Limit of Discipline:From the Perspective of Educational Theories of Durkheim and Foucault
下载PDF
导出
摘要 涂尔干从功能主义的视角出发,认为纪律精神有助于社会团结,对个体的自由也是有益的。福柯基于后结构主义的立场,认为纪律是无所不在的微观控制技术,个体可能在纪律的笼罩下变得顺从。比较涂尔干和福柯观点可以发现,纪律在主体构造过程中具有一定的意义,也存在局限。当代中国学校教育要超越纪律的限度,需要从刻板的规章走向自主个体的培养。 Discipline is the core institution of schools and it is an important problem for Chinese teachers to train the students to he both sprightly and serious. This paper studies the meaning and limit of discipline in the process of constructing subject through comparing Durkheim's and Foucault's educational theories. Based on functionalism, Durkheim argued that discipline spirit helped to integrate society and was good for individual freedom. From the perspective of post-structuralism, Foucault pointed out that discipline was the omnipresent micro-controlling tactics, and at its shadow the individual may become tame. This paper argues that the discipline in contemporary Chinese schools should change from the routine regulations to the cultivation of the independent individuality.
作者 沈洪成
出处 《教育学术月刊》 北大核心 2011年第3期20-22,26,共4页 Education Research Monthly
关键词 现代教育 纪律 社会团结 Modern Education Discipline Social Solidarity Tame Individuality
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1詹姆斯·马歇尔,米歇尔·福柯.个人自主与教育[M].于伟,李姗姗译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2008:75.
  • 2米歇尔·福柯.什么是启蒙?.国外社会学,1997,(6).
  • 3雷蒙·阿隆.社会学主要思潮[M].北京:华夏出版社,2000.
  • 4爱弥儿·涂尔干.道德教育[M].陈光金,沈杰,朱谐汉译.上海:上海人民出版社,2001:33,42-47,51,66-68,91-92,309,316,315,2.
  • 5史蒂文·塞德曼.有争议的知识:后现代时代的社会理论[M].刘北成等译.北京:人民大学出版社,2002:29-30.
  • 6Max Weber. Economy and Society [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978. 53-54.
  • 7歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].刘北成,杨远婴译.北京:三联书店,2003:28,224,197,200,210.
  • 8黄瑞琪.再见福柯:福柯晚期思想研究[C].浙江大学出版社,2008:115.
  • 9马克·波斯特.信息方式:后结构主义与社会语境[M].范静哗译.北京:商务印书馆,2001:127.
  • 10安东尼·吉登斯.杜尔凯姆[M].北京:昆仑出版社,1999:31.

二级参考文献4

共引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部