摘要
陈平原、王晓明的《新青年》研究体现了他们做学问的不同路数:一个以史证见长,一个以发明著称。通过辨析他们对《新青年》的不同读法,不仅让我们领略两位学人不同的治学理路、风貌、情采与智慧,更由此促使我们思考中国现代文学研究的两种范式问题,以期实现思想与学术的互动,保持中国现代文学研究的生机与活力。
The research made by Chen Ping-yuan and Wang Xiao-ming on New Youth reflects their different approaches to research.Chen is good at the use of historic facts while Wang is famous for his inventions.By differentiating and analyzing their different ways of reading New Youth,not only can we understand their different means of pursuing their studies,their styles and features as well as their literary grace and wisdom,but we can be urged to think deeply about the two canonical forms of Chinese contemporary literary research.We hope that,in this way,thought will mutualize academy and Chinese contemporary literary research will be kept vigorous.
出处
《嘉应学院学报》
2011年第1期55-58,共4页
Journal of Jiaying University
关键词
陈平原
王晓明
《新青年》研究
研究路数
思想与学术
Chen Ping-yuan
Wang Xiao-ming
research on New Youth
approaches to research
thought and academy