期刊文献+

中文版死亡态度描绘量表修订版的信效度研究 被引量:45

Validation of a Chinese version of Death Attitude Profile-Revised
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的译制中文版死亡态度描绘量表一修订版(death attitude profile-revised,DAP-R)并验证该量表在中老年基督教信徒中应用的信度和效度。方法完成中文版DAP-R量表翻译,经专家咨询及小样本访谈研究修正后,对150名中老年基督教信徒进行调查,采用因子分析、相关分析及信效度分析等统计方法评价中文版DAP-R量表的信效度。结果中文版DAP-R量表包括25个条目,因子分析产生7个因子,能解释总变异的67.075%,且各条目在其相应维度上均有较高的因子负荷;各条目与所属维度的Pearson相关系数在0.432~0.850;各维度的Cronbach’s α系数在0.585-0.853,总量表的Cronbach’s α系数和折半系数分别为0.840、0.843。结论中文版DAP.R量表在中国城市中老年基督教信徒中应用具有较好的信效度,仍需在更大样本更多人群中进行验证。 Objective To develop a Chinese version of Death Attitude Profile-Revised(DAP-R)and evaluate its reliability and validity by applying it in the Chinese Christians. Methods After undergoing forward and backward translation of the DAP-R by expert consultation and in-depth interview,150 Chris- tians over 40 years old were recruited to complete the Chinese version of DAP-R, And then factor analysis, correlation analysis and reliability analysis were applied to establish the scale's construct validity and relia- bility. Results The final scale consisted of five dimensions with 25 items; the varimax rotation factor analysis of the scale identified seven principal factors and explained for 67.075% variances; the correlation coefficient between each item and its domain was 0.432-0.850; Cronbach's α coefficient of five domains were 0.585-0.853, the Cronbach's α and split-half coefficient for the whole scale were 0.840 and 0.843 respectively. Conclusions The Chinese version of DAP-R possesses acceptable validity and reliability in the setting of Christians, and more in-depth study on the scale needs to be done in a wider population.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2011年第8期51-53,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 DAP R中文修订版 死亡态度 信度 效度 临终护理 Death Attitude Profile-Revised Attitude to death Reliability Validity Hospice care
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献29

共引文献97

同被引文献522

引证文献45

二级引证文献465

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部