法官事实认定面孔融合下的有限能动——以民事庭审为视角

The Fusion of Two Faces:the Limited Dynamic of Fact-Determining Judge——From the Perspective of Civil Trial

本文以两个案情相似但结果迥异的民事案例为切入点,通过对笔录的分析,勾勒出我国基层法官在民事庭审中对事实认定呈现的两种面孔——回应型和能动型;同时,两位法官均不是纯粹的回应型和能动型面孔,又恰恰反映出当下我国基层法院法官在民事庭审事实认定中出现的两种面孔融合趋势,即法官的有限能动面孔。本文通过访谈方式、运用数据分析、成本分析及价值权衡等研究方法,分析两种面孔之成因并指出其融合之必要性,最后得出完善我国法官释明权制度,确立有限能动庭审面孔的结论。

This thesis studies two civil cases with similar facts but quite different court decisions.Through an analysis of the cases＇ notes,two styles of judges in conducting the civil trial＇s fact-finding will emerge——the responsiveness and the activeness.But the very two judges are not totally responsive or active,which reflects a new trend of blending the two styles in civil trial＇s fact-finding on the part of judges,namely,the judge＇s limited activeness.Based on research methods like interviews,data analysis,cost analysis and value trade-off,this thesis will try to explore the reasons behind the development of the two styles and point out the necessity to blend the two.Furthermore,a conclusion will be made at the end of the thesis,that is,our country＇s system of the judges＇ aufklarungsrecht should be perfected,and the trial＇s limited activeness established.