期刊文献+

基于主观综合评判的作战仿真可信度评估方法研究 被引量:11

Research on a Credibility Evaluation Method for Warfare Simulation Based on the Subject Integrate Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可信度是作战仿真的生命线,对作战仿真系统建设全生命周期进行校核、验证与确认(verification,validation and accreditation,VV&A)是确保其可信度的重要途径。合适的评估方法是进行可信度评估的前提条件。在全面分析与比较已有可信度评估方法基础上,针对作战仿真可信度评估中突出主题专家作用的特点,提出了一种基于主观综合评判的可信度评估方法,重点设计了基于专长权的主题专家权重定量计算方法。这些方法都被应用于"××作战仿真系统"的可信度评估工作中。实践表明,本文的研究对于作战仿真系统等复杂仿真系统的可信度评估非常有效。 The credibility is the lifeline for warfare simulation.To execute verification,validation and accreditation(VVA) is an important approach to insure the credibility of warfare simulation system all the life circle.A proper method is the precondition for credibility evaluation.On the basis of analysis and comparison with existing evaluation methods,the subject integrated judgment method was put forward,aiming at the characteristics of giving prominence to the function of subject matter expert(SME) in the credibility evaluation for warfare simulation.Furthermore,a method of quantitative weights calculating based on SME was designed as the focal part of the research.These methods were applied in credibility evaluation of the warfare simulation system.The practice shows that the research is highly effective for complex system simulation,such as warfare simulation system.
出处 《国防科技大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期153-157,共5页 Journal of National University of Defense Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60904055) 国家部委重点基金项目(9140A04010110KG0110)
关键词 可信度评估 作战仿真 主观综合评判方法 主题专家 权重计算 credibility evaluation warfare simulation subject integrate judgment method subject matter expert(SME) weight calculating
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王子才,张冰,杨明.仿真系统的校核、验证与验收(VV&A):现状与未来[J].系统仿真学报,1999,11(5):321-325. 被引量:61
  • 2Balci O,Ormsby W F.Expanding Our Horizons in Verification,Validation and Accreditation Research and Practice[C]//Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference,2002:653-663.
  • 3Sargent R G,Nance R E,Overstreet C M,et al.The Simulation Project Life-cycle:Models and Realities[C]//Winter Simulation Conference,2006:863-871.
  • 4胡晓峰.战争模拟引论[M].北京:国防大学出版社,2004..
  • 5U.S.Defense Modeling and Simulation Office (DMSO).Verification,Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) Recommended Practices Guide[EB].http://vva.dmso.mil,Build 2-5,2004.
  • 6Dobey V T,Lewis R O.Verification,Validation,and Accreditation (VV&A) Process Overlay for the FEDEP[C]//Spring SIW (03S-SIW-085).April 2003.
  • 7唐见兵,焦鹏,黄晓慧,查亚兵.基于仿真组件构建的HLA仿真系统VV&A研究[J].系统仿真学报,2009,21(9):2478-2481. 被引量:1
  • 8唐见兵,黄晓慧,焦鹏,查亚兵.复杂大系统仿真的VV&A理论及过程研究[J].国防科技大学学报,2009,31(3):122-126. 被引量:5
  • 9廖英,等.系统建模与仿真的校核、验证与确认(VV&A)技术[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,2006.

二级参考文献12

  • 1龚建兴,韩超,邱晓刚,黄柯棣.构建可扩展的HLA联邦成员架构[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(11):3126-3130. 被引量:23
  • 2唐见兵,李革.HLA作战仿真的VV&A过程[J].计算机工程,2007,33(14):254-256. 被引量:2
  • 3张冰 杨明 等.分布交互仿真中的DR技术综述评价研究[J].系统仿真学报,待发表,.
  • 4徐学文.美国校核、验证与确认实践指南(上、下册)[M].北京:海潮出版社,2001.
  • 5唐见兵 焦鹏 李革.基于HLA的作战仿真系统的VV&A研究.系统仿真技术及应用,2007,9:415-418.
  • 6Defense U S. Modeling and Simulation Office (DMSO). Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A) Recommended Practices Guide[ R/ OL] .http://VVa.dmso.mil, Build 2.5, 2004.
  • 7廖英,等.系统建模与仿真的校核、验证与确认(VV&A)技术[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,2006.
  • 8Balci O. Verification, Validation and Accreditation[C]//Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 1998.
  • 9Dobey V T,Lewis R O. Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) Process Overlay for the FEDEP[C]//Spring SIW,2003.
  • 10唐见兵,焦鹏,查亚兵,李革.基于BOM的HLA仿真系统可信性研究[J].国防科技大学学报,2008,30(5):131-134. 被引量:7

共引文献140

同被引文献106

引证文献11

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部