期刊文献+

词义引申误为假借的一个重要原因——以“釐”一词引申系列为例

An Important Reason of why Extension of Word Meaning is Mistaken as Phonetic Loaning:a Case Study of the word "li" (釐)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 词义引申在传统小学文献中常被误为文字的假借,以"釐"一词意义引申系列为例:清儒《说文》四大家及当代较为有影响的两部通假字典对"釐"本义、假借义和引申义有不同认定。但结合甲、金文对"釐"字形义的释读,"釐"之真正本义应为"以手扑麦脱粒",其"治理"、"家福"和"延引"都是其引申义。在"釐"一词内部各个不同引申义当中,关系相对疏远的不同引申义受源于"釐"一词不同的词义特点(即所指客观事物的不同特征)。如若忽略这点,词义引申常常会被误认为是文字假借。 In traditional documents of preliminary schools, extension of words meaning is always mistaken asphonetic loaning. Take the word "li" as an example. The four famous Qing scholars who wrote Shuowen and thetwo influential contemporary dictionaries of interchangeable characters have made different definitions on theoriginal meaning, the loaned meaning and the extension meaning of "li". But according to the interpretations fromoracle and the inscription on bronze, the true original meaning of "li" should be "to thresh wheat by hands", and"manage", "bless for families" and "draw" are all extension meanings. And in these different extension meanings,the ones with respectively not very close meanings are due to the different characters of word meaning (i.e., thedifferent features of different objectives). If we ignore this point, the extension of word meaning will always bemistaken as phonetic loaning.
作者 王建军
出处 《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2010年第6期78-81,共4页 Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 本义 引申义 假借义 original meaning extension meaning loaned meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1东汉·许慎.说文解字[M].北京:中华书局.1963.
  • 2(清)段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.
  • 3清·杵馥.说文解字义证[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
  • 4清·朱骏声编著.说文通训定声[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
  • 5王海根.古汉语通假字大字典[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2006.
  • 6李孝定.甲骨文字集释[M].台北:中央研究院历史语言研究所,1970.
  • 7周法高.金文诂林[M].香港:香港中文大学,1974.
  • 8李茂康.形借说浅析[J].古汉语研究,1997(3):71-74. 被引量:3
  • 9董琨.汉语的词义蕴含与汉字的兼义造字[J].中国语文,1994(3):226-230. 被引量:8

共引文献200

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部