3Gall D, Nielsen K. Comparison of some methods for determing cutoff values for serological assays: a retrospective study using the fluorescence polarization assay. J Immunoassay Immunochem,2001,22 : 85-98.
4Ridge SE, Vizard AL. Determination of the optimal cutoff value for a serological assay: an example using the Johne's Absorbed E IA. J Clin Microbiol,1993,31:1256-1261.
5Larsson A, Karlsson-Parra A, Sjoquist J. Use of chicken antibodies in enzyme immunoassays to avoid interference by rheumatoid factors. Clin Chem,1991,37:411-414.
6Carlander D, Larsson A. Avian antibodies can eliminate interference due to complement activation in ELISA. Ups J Med Sci ,2001,106:189-195.
7Larsson A,Wejaker PE, Forsberg PO, et al. Chicken antibodies: a tool to avoid interference by complement activation in ELISA. J Immunol Methods,1992,156:79-83.
8Bormer OP. Interference of complement with the binding of carcinoembryonic antigen to solid-phase monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods, 1989,121:85-93.
9Grebenchtchikov N, Sweep CG, Geurts-Moespot A, et al. An ELISA avoiding interference by heterophilic antibodies in the measurement of components of the plasminogen activation system in blood. J Immunol Methods ,2002,268:219-231.
10Andersson M, Ronnmark J, Arestrom I, et al. Inclusion of a non-immunoglobulin binding protein in two-site ELISA for quantification of human serum proteins without interference by heterophilic serum antibodies. J Immunol Methods,2003,283:225-234.
