期刊文献+

The Comparative Role of Intervening Variables in Understanding Farmers' Adoption Behavior

The Comparative Role of Intervening Variables in Understanding Farmers' Adoption Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The purpose of this study was to indentify the most important determinants associated with behavior change by comparing the influence of intervening variables and the characteristics of the farmer and the farm (independent variables) on the adoption behavior of farmers for recommended agronomic practices. A total of 107 farmers out of a population of 214 were randomly selected from two adjoining districts of South Africa and Lesotho. Chi-square and correlations and regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between the independent, dependent and intervening variables. The results show clear differences between the independent in regard to their influence on adoption behavior, but these influences also vary significantly between the practices. In general the influence of independent variable is limited, and together their total contribution in explaining the variance in adoption (R2) varied between about 20 to 40 percent whilst that of the intervening variables varied between 50 and over 70 percent, which clearly supports the research hypothesis that their prediction arid explanation value in terms of behavior is much bigger than that of independent, personal and environmental factors.
出处 《Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology》 2011年第3期290-297,共8页 农业科学与技术(美国大卫英文)
关键词 ADOPTION intervening variables behavior change DECISION-MAKING innovations. 行为 民采 中介 独立变量 农艺措施 邻近地区 随机抽取 回归分析
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1J.P. Leagan, C.P. Loomis, Behavioral Change in Agriculture: Concepts and Strategies for Influencing Transition, Comell University Press, Ithaca, 1971.
  • 2P. Dierderen, V.H. Meijl, A. Wolters, K. Bijak, Innovation adoption hi agriculture: Innovators, early adopters and laggards, Cahier d'economie et Sociologie Rurales 67 (2003) 30-49.
  • 3N. Roling, Extension Science: Information Systems in Agricultural Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
  • 4J.D. Ford, L.W. Ford, A.D. Amelo, Resistance to change: The rest of the stow, Academy of Management Review 33 (2008) 2.
  • 5E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd ed., The Free Press, New York, 1983.
  • 6B. Ryan, N. Gross, The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in Iowa communities, Rural Sociology 8 (1943) 15-24.
  • 7R.J.F. Burton, Reconceptualising the 'behavioural approach" in agricultural studies: A socio-psychological perspective, Journal of Rural Studies 20 (2004) 359-371.
  • 8R. Gasson, Goals and values of farmers, Journal of Agricultural Economics 24 (1973) 521-542.
  • 9D.A. Gilmore, Behavioural studies in agriculture: Goals, values and enterprise choice, IR. J. Agric. Econ. Rur. Sociology 11 (1986) 19-33.
  • 10C.M. Coughenour, L.E. Swanson, Rewards, values, and satisfaction with farm work, Rural Sociology 55 (1988) 442-459.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部