期刊文献+

管理层自利、董事会治理与费用粘性——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据 被引量:93

Managerial Self-interest,Board Governance and Cost Stickiness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 业务量等额增减变化时成本费用减少的幅度小于成本费用增加的幅度。这与传统的成本性态模型中假设成本费用随业务量的增减同幅度地增减变动有着明显的差异。对中国沪深两市740家A股制造业上市公司2007—2009年的年度财务数据测试发现:制造业上市公司销管费用确实存在粘性行为:营业收入增加1%,销管费用增加0.5876%,而营业收入减少1%,销管费用减少0.4112%;制造业上市公司管理层自利行为和销管费用粘性程度之间存在正相关关系;两职(董事会主席和CEO)分离可以有效控制销管费用粘性水平;独立董事比例和销管费用粘性程度之间具有负相关关系;董事会规模和销管费用粘性水平之间呈现正相关关系,但未通过显著性检验。 The reductive range of cost is less than the increased range when the portfolio matching increasing and decreasing,which behaviour contradicts the traditional model which assumes that costs behave symmetrically for activity increases and decreases.With the analysis of accounting data of 740 Chinese manufacturing listed companies during 2007 to 2009,we find that SGA costs are sticky in response to changes in revenues.SGA costs increase,on average,by around 0.5876% per 1% increase in revenues,but decrease by only 0.4112% per 1% decrease in revenues.There is a positive association between managerial self-interest behavior and the degree of SGA costs stickiness.The coefficient of CEO and chairman separation is significantly positive,which can reduce the degree of SGA costs stickiness.There is a negative association between independent directors and the degree of SGA.There is a positive association between board size and the degree of SGA costs stickiness,which is also not significant.
出处 《经济与管理》 CSSCI 2011年第3期26-32,共7页 Economy and Management
关键词 费用粘性 管理层自利 董事会治理 cost stickiness managerial self-interest board governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1孙铮,刘浩.中国上市公司费用“粘性”行为研究[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):26-34. 被引量:486
  • 2Mark C. Anderson, Rajiv D. Banker and Surya N. Janakiraman. Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs "Sticky"? [J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2003,41 (1) : 47-63.
  • 3Marcia Lynne Weidenmier and Chandra Subramaniam. Additional Evidence on the Sticky Behavior of Costs. Working Paper[D ]. Texas Christian University, 2003.
  • 4Ramji Balakrishnan, Thomas S. Gruca. Cost Stickiness and Core Competency: A Note [J]. Contemporary Ac- counting Research, 2008,25 (4): 993-1006.
  • 5Kenneth CaUeja. Michael Steliaros. Dylan C. Thomas. A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons [J].ManagementAccounting Research,2006,17 : 127-140.
  • 6Clara Xiaoling Chen, Hai Lu and Theodore Sougiannis. Managerial Empire Building, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, andAdministrative Costs. AAA 2008 Financial Accounting and Reporting Section (FARS) Paper, (CAAA) 2008Annum Conference Paper. University of Illinois at Urba- na-Champaign and University of Toronto,2008.
  • 7Carsten Homburg and Julia Nasev. How Timely are Earnings When Costs are Sticky? Implications for theLink Between Conditional Conservatism and Cost Sticki- ness. AAA 2009 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper. University of Cologne,2009.
  • 8孔玉生,朱乃平,孔庆根.成本粘性研究:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007(11):58-65. 被引量:268
  • 9刘武.企业费用“粘性”行为:基于行业差异的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(12):105-112. 被引量:183
  • 10刘永红.成本粘性的探讨[J].会计师,2009(1):82-83. 被引量:4

二级参考文献37

共引文献561

同被引文献732

引证文献93

二级引证文献453

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部