期刊文献+

基于转喻认知机制的语用推理研究 被引量:4

A Study of Pragmatic Inference from a Metonymic Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语用学和认知语言学都关注语言理解中推理的作用,但它们的侧重点却有所不同。认知语言学认为言语交际中的推理与激活人们大脑中的概念结构有关,强调概念的激活和映现在语言理解和推理中的主导作用;而语用学则更关注语境和语用原则的作用。本文在讨论推理的语用和认知研究的基础上,分析转喻认知在语用推理中的作用,探讨指称锁定、言语行为和含义推导的转喻认知机理。 Meaning inference is a common core concerned for by both pragmaticians and cognitive linguists,but they have different proposals.Cognitive linguists put more emphases on the activation of conceptual structures as interpretive guideposts,while pragmaticians focus on the principles of inferring the meaning from conversations,and put more emphases on context of language use.Based on the cognitive and pragmatic studies of inferencing,this article explores the role of metonymy in utterance interpretation,revealing the conceptual schema of pragmatic inference which underlies the way we understand reference assignment,speech act and conversational implicature.
作者 江晓红
出处 《山东外语教学》 北大核心 2011年第1期10-16,共7页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划项目(08GK-04)的阶段性成果
关键词 转喻认知 语用推理 指称锁定 言语行为 含义推导 conceptual metonymy pragmatic inference reference assignment speech act conversational implicature
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Barcelona, A. The case for a metonymic basis of pragnatic inferencing[ A ]. In K-U. Panther & L.Thomburg ( eds. ). Metonymy and Pragmatic Infer-encing [ C ]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Ben- jamins, 2003. 81- 104.
  • 2Collins, A. M. & E. F. Loftus. A spreading acti- vation theory of semantic processing[J]. Psychologi- cal Review, 1975,82:407 - 428.
  • 3Gibbs, R. W. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding [ M ] . Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 4Gibbs, R. W. Speaking and thinking with metonymy [A]. In K-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.). Me-tonymy in Language and Thought [ C ]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999.61 - 76.
  • 5Grice, H. P. Logic and conversation[A]. In P.Cole (ed.). Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1975.41-58.
  • 6Jackendoff, R. Foundations of Language : Brain,Meaning, Grammar, Evolution [ M]. Oxford: Ox- ford University Press, 2002.
  • 7John-Larid, P. N. Mental Models: Towards a Cog-nitive Science of Language, Inference, and Con-sciousness [ M ]. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress, 1983.
  • 8Lakoff, G & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 9Levinson, S. C. Presumptive Meaning: The Theoryof Generalized Conversational Implicature [ M ]. Cam- bridge: The M1T Press, 2000.
  • 10Panther, K-U. & L. Thomburg. A Cognitive ap-proach to inferencing in conversation [J ]. Journal ofPragnmtics, 1998,30:755 - 769.

二级参考文献44

共引文献87

同被引文献26

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量:717
  • 2张辉 ,孙明智 .概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):1-6. 被引量:146
  • 3张辉,周平.转喻与语用推理图式[J].外国语,2002,25(4):46-52. 被引量:54
  • 4KOVECSES Z, G RADDEN. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998, 9 ( 1 ) : 37-77.
  • 5RADDEN G, Z KOVECSES. Towards a theory of Metonymy[M]// PANTHER K-U, G RADDEN. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1999: 17-60.
  • 6QUIRK R. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language [M]. London: Longman, 1985.
  • 7Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez Francisco J, Diez Velasco O I. High-level Metonymy and Linguistic Structure[J]. Atlantis, 2001, 19 ( 1 ) : 297-314.
  • 8DIRVEN R. Conversion as a Conceptual Metonymy of Event Schemata[M]// PANTHER K-U, G. RADDEN. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1999: 275-287.
  • 9陆谷孙.英汉大词典[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1993..
  • 10Lakoff George.Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. . 1987

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部