期刊文献+

妇科腹腔镜手术七氟醚与丙泊酚麻醉恢复期的比较 被引量:14

Comparison between Sevoflurane and Propofol recovery from anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopical surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较妇科腹腔镜术中七氟醚-瑞芬太尼静吸复合麻醉与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉复合麻醉的恢复情况。方法:将ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级择期行腹腔镜妇科手术的患者50例,随机分为七氟醚-瑞芬太尼静吸复合麻醉组(M组)和丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉复合麻醉组(N组),每组25例。分别记录、对比分析两组麻醉效果。结果:M组术后不良反应事件中恶心发生率为36%(9/25),与N组8%(2/25)比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.20,P<0.05),七氟醚-瑞芬太尼静吸复合麻醉组恶心发生率高于丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉复合麻醉组。自主呼吸恢复时间,M组为(6.30±0.80)min,N组为(7.90±0.86)min,t=-6.79,P<0.01;睁眼时间,M组为(7.40±0.87)min,N组为(9.20±1.00)min,t=-6.64,P<0.01;拔管时间,M组为(9.30±0.84)min,N组为(10.90±0.88)min,t=-6.56,P<0.01;定向力恢复时间,M组为(10.80±1.21)min,N组为(12.60±1.50)min,t=-4.45,P<0.01,故M组与N组在自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间等方面比较差异有统计学意义,七氟醚-瑞芬太尼复合麻醉有显著优势。结论:七氟醚-瑞芬太尼复合麻醉在妇科腹腔镜手术麻醉中可以提供较满意的麻醉效果,术后苏醒快,恢复质量高,是较为理想的麻醉方法。 Objective:To compare recovery in the gynecological laparoscopic surgery with Sevoflurane-inhalation anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia.Methods:ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ class scheduled for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery,50 cases were randomly divided into Sevoflurane-Remifentanil inhalation anesthesia group(M group) and Propofol-Remifentanil intravenous anesthesia group(N group) in 25 cases.Anesthesia effect of two groups were recorded and compared.Results:The incidence of nausea in adverse events in M group of 36% compared with 8% in N group was significant(χ2=4.20,P0.05),the incidence of nausea of M group was higher than that of N group.Recovery time of spontaneous breathing,M group was(6.30±0.80) min,N group with(7.90±0.86) min,t=-6.79,P0.01;eye opening,M group was(7.40±0.87) min,N group with(9.20±1.00) min,t=-6.64,P0.01,extubation time:M group was(9.30±0.84) min,N group with(10.90±0.88) min,t=-6.56,P0.01;recovery time of orientation:M group was(10.80±1.21) min,N group with(12.60±1.50) min,t=-4.45,P0.01;Therefore,in the M group and N group recovery time of spontaneous breathing,eye opening,tracheal extubation,orientation and other aspects of the recovery time was statistically significant,Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia had significant advantages.Conclusion:Sevoflurane-Remifentanil anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery may provide satisfactory anesthesia,rapid recovery after surgery,recovery of high quality,is an ideal method of anesthesia.
作者 刘慧锦
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第9期72-74,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 七氟醚 丙泊酚 瑞芬太尼 麻醉 腹腔镜手术 Sevoflurane Propofol Remifentanil Anesthesia Laparoscopic surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献47

  • 1李勇,王杨,汪小海.七氟醚和氟烷在小儿唇腭裂手术麻醉中应用的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(12):943-943. 被引量:10
  • 2GODET G, WATREMEZ C. EL KETTANI C, et al. A comparison of sevoflurane, larger-controlled infusion propofol, and propofol/isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid surgery a quality of anesthesia and recovery profile[ J]. Anesth Analg,2001. 93(3) :560 -565.
  • 3ADAMUS M, KOUTNA J, GABRHELIK T, et al. Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxant-the impact of different sufentanil doses on the quality of intubating conditions: a prospective study [J]. Cas Lek Cesk, 2008,147(2) :96 - 101.
  • 4SCHRICKER T, CARLI F, SCHREIBER M, et al. Propofol/ sufentanil anesthesia supresses the metabolic and endocrine response during, not after, lower abdominal surgery [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90(2) :450 -455.
  • 5BROCKMANA C, RAASCH W, BASTIAN C. Endocrine stressparameters during TITV with remifentanil or sufentanil[ J ]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther, 2000, 35 ( 11 ) :685 - 691.
  • 6MARTIN LR, GILSANZ F, JODRIGO J, et al. Conventional slepwise VS vital capacity rapid inhalation indunction at two concentrations of sevoflurane [ J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2004,21:265 - 271.
  • 7JOSHI GP.Complications of laparoscopic surgery [ J ].Anesthesiol Clin North America, 2001,19( 1 ) : 89-105.
  • 8O'MALLEY C,CUNNINGHAM AJ.Physiologic changes during laparoscopy[ J ].Anesthesiol Clin North America, 2001,19( 1 ) : 1- 19.
  • 9GREENBERG BH,HERMANN DD,PRANULIS MF,et al.Reproducibility of impedance cardiography hemodynamic measures in clinically stable heart failure patients[ J].Congest Heart Fail,2000,6(2) : 74-80.
  • 10YUNG GL,FEDULLO PF,KINNINGER K,et al.Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension [J].Congest Heart Fail,2004,10(Suppl 2) :7-10.

共引文献115

同被引文献116

引证文献14

二级引证文献157

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部