摘要
因不可归责于自身的事由导致债务人违约,债务人又因同一原因获得对第三人的请求权的,德国和我国台湾地区运用代偿请求权制度保护债权人利益,实现法的正义价值。与类似的制度相比较,代偿请求权具有独立的制度功能。我国引入代偿请求权制度,能够为当事人的权利救济提供更多的制度选择。在具体制度设计上,应当充分考虑我国的本土化需求,采用代偿请求权制度与《合同法》第121条并存的制度模式。
In the circumstance where a debtor breaches the contract not due to his own performances and for the same reason of breaching of contract,the debtor obtains a right to request the third party to perform or not,the replacement claim right of compensation is applied in German and Taiwan to protect benefits of the debtee and realize the just value of law.In comparison with the similar institutions,it has the independent functions.If introduced into China,it can provide more choices for parties to protect their rights.In specific Reconstruction of institution,we should take full account of the demand of localization of China,and adopt the institution model of coexistence of the institution of the replacement claim right of compensation and the article 121 in China's Contract Law.
出处
《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期71-75,192,共5页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
2009年国家精品课程<经济法>建设资助项目(教育部教高函[2009]21号)
项目负责人:宋宗宇
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"代偿请求权的法律机理与制度设计"(CDJXS10080003)
项目负责人:王耀东