雾化泵与超声雾化器药物吸入辅助治疗支气管哮喘疗效比较及护理

Effect comparation and nursing of spray pump and ultrasonic atomizer in drug inhalation as the adjuvant treatment for bronchial asthma

目的比较雾化泵与超声雾化器药物吸入辅助治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效,并探讨其护理方法。方法 112例患者随机分为观察组和对照组各56例。观察组采用雾化泵药物吸入,对照组采用超声雾化器吸入药物辅助治疗,比较2组的临床疗效。结果观察组有效率为91.1%高于对照组的89.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组有4例出现呼吸困难、咳嗽、发绀等不良反应,观察组未见明显不适。结论雾化吸入药物辅助治疗支气管哮喘疗效较好,雾化泵较超声雾化吸入疗效更稳定,且不良反应小,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of spray pump and ultrasonic atomizer in drug inhalation as the adjuvant treatment for bronchial asthma,and explore its nursing methods.Methods 112 cases were randomly divided into observation group and control group,56 cases of each.The observation group was treated with spray pump,while the control group was treated with ultrasonic atomizer for the adjuvant therapy.The efficacy of 2 groups were compared.Results The effective rate of the observation group was 91.1% higher than 89.3% of the control group,but the difference was of no statistical significance（P0.05）.4 cases of the control group happened adverse reactions,such as difficult breathing,cough,cyanose,and so on,but none of the observation group happened significant discomfort.Conclusion Adjuvant treatment of aerosol inhalation has good effect on bronchial asthma,and the efficacy of using spray pump is more stable than using ultrasonic atomizer with less adverse reaction,so it is worth clinical popularizing and application.