期刊文献+

改易天朝体制的初试(上)——义律融调中西的模式及其趋向 被引量:1

An Attempt to Alter the Celestial Dynasty System——The Mode Elliont Reconciling the East and the West and Its Tendency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 天朝体制是中国封建时代特有的对外关系模式,鸦片战争前,英国力图改易之,它开始遭遇了前所未有的挑战。在律劳卑的强横方式受挫之后,义律进行了新的尝试,其职官身份得到了天朝的认可。由于与本国政府的意旨不相枘凿,义律陷入了"遵此违彼"的两难之中,刚建立的官方关系中断。为打破僵局,义律更明确地提出融通中外体制的主张,设想了在他看来可以两全的新方案,未被中方接受。广东厉行禁烟之时,义律对方案作了调整,广东当局也有所变通。中英由此实现了"官方直接通讯",而由于鸦片战争的爆发,打断了这一进程。义律对华较为平和,较少强权意识,注定了被免职的结局。但他融调中西的模式及其揭示的趋向,对于探讨文明冲突,提供了可资参考的启示。 The celestial dynasty system was a special mode of external relations.The British endeavored to alter it before the Opium Warin,but encountered unprecedented challenge.After W.J Napier's tyrannical way was thwarted,Elliont changed his way and got his official status affirmed by the celestial dynasty.Because what he had done did not conform to the British government,Elliont was caught into a dilemma of "complying this while violating that",and the lately –built governmental relationship broke off.In order to break the deadlock,Elliont explicitly put forward a brand-new proposition of reconciling Chinese system and Western system,which was not accepted by the celestial dynasty.When the campaigns against opium smoking were conducted in Guang-dong province,Elliont adjusted his proposition,so did Guang-dong authorities.Thus,Sino-Britain realized "the direct official communication",which was interrupted by the broke-off of the Opium War.Elliont,moderate and with less power consciousness,was destined to be relieved of his post.However,the mode in which he reconciled the East and the West offered some enlightenments to probing into the civilization conflict.
作者 李育民
出处 《晋阳学刊》 CSSCI 2011年第2期89-96,共8页 Academic Journal of Jinyang
基金 国家社科基金"晚清中外条约关系研究"(07BZS033)阶段成果
关键词 天朝体制 融调中西 义律 改易 The celestial dynasty system Reconcile East and West Elliont Altering
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1[美]马士.中华帝国对外关系史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1963.
  • 2[美]马士.东印度公司对华贸易编年史:1635-1834年[M].广州:中山大学出版社,1991.
  • 3英使马戛尔尼来聘案·译出英吉利国表文[A].故宫博物院掌故部掌故丛编[Z].北京:中华书局,1990.
  • 4.清实录[Z].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 5吴义雄.权力与体制:义律与1834—1839年的中英关系[J].历史研究,2007(1):63-87. 被引量:13
  • 6武汉大学历史系鸦片战争研究组.外国学者论鸦片战争与林则徐[Z].福州:福建人民出版社,1989.
  • 7英国档案有关鸦片战争资料选译[Z].北京:中华书局,1993.
  • 8故宫博物院.史料旬刊[Z].北京:北京图书馆出版社,2008.
  • 9梁廷柑,等.粤海关志[Z].台北:文海出版社有限公司,1975年影印.
  • 10清代外交史料·道光朝[Z].故宫博物院,1932.

二级参考文献123

  • 1张馨保.《林钦差与鸦片战争》.徐梅芬,等译.福建人民出版社1989年版,第56页.
  • 2Charles Elliot, "Official Notice," December 31^st, 1836, FO 17/15, p. 97.
  • 3《著两广总督邓廷桢准许英领事依照前大班来粤章程至省照料商务事上谕》,《鸦片战争档案史料》第1册,第226页.
  • 4伍绍荣等致义律,《鸦片战争前中英交涉文书》,道光十七年第4号,第94页.
  • 5《鸦片战争前中英交涉文书》,道光十七年第6—14号,第95—98页.
  • 6Charles Elliot to John Backhouse, June 2^nd, 1837, FO 17/20,(Foreign Office General Correspondence before 1906, China,英国外交部档案,缩微胶卷,),p. 145.
  • 7《鸦片战争前中英交涉文书》,道光十七年第20-28号,第97—100页.
  • 8义律致邓廷桢,《鸦片战争前中英交涉文书》,道光十七年第22号,第103页.
  • 9邓廷桢谕总商,《鸦片战争前中英交涉文书》,道光十七年第27号,第105页.
  • 10Charles Elliot to Palmerston, January 29^th, 1837, FO 17/19,(Foreign Office General Correspondence before 1906, China,英国外交部档案,缩微胶卷,),pp. 108--111.

共引文献17

同被引文献36

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部