期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

反垄断法域外适用管辖权冲突之协调——以美德两国法律的比较考察为基础

The Coordination of the Jurisdiction Conflict of the Extraterritorial Application of the Antitrust Acts——On the Basis of the Comparative of American Law and German Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美德两国都将效果原则作为确定反垄断法域外适用管辖权的基础。在协调与其他国家有关反垄断法域外适用的冲突时,美国借鉴国际私法上有关法律选择的考量因素,采用"利益衡量"方法进行协调,德国考虑遵守国际法上的不干涉原则,强调国家主权。美德两国有关反垄断法域外适用管辖权冲突之协调方法值得我国立法借鉴。 Both American law and German law use rule of effect as the basis of the jurisdiction of the extraterritorial of the antitrust acts. In coordinating conflict with other country extraterritorial of the antitrust acts, American borrows the method of choice of law in private international law, using interest balance method to coordinate, and German consider non -intervention principle in international law and territorial sovereignty. The method of coordination of the jurisdiction conflict of the extraterritorial of the antitrust acts in American and German deserve our country to study.
作者 周后春 屈广清
机构地区 广州大学法学院 福建江夏学院
出处 《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》 CSSCI 2011年第2期59-64,104,共7页 Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
基金 广州市社科规划项目的阶段性成果(项目编号:09G-09)
关键词 反垄断法 域外适用 管辖权 antitrust acts extraterritorial application jurisdiction
分类号 D922.29 [政治法律—经济法学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co. 213 U. S. 347,356 - 7 (1909).
  • 2Alcoa, 148 F. 2d at 443.
  • 3Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, N. T, 549 F. 2d 597,609( C. A. Cal. 1976).
  • 4Timberlane ,549 F. 2d at 609 n27.
  • 5Mannington Mill, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp. 595 F. 2d 1287,1294(C. A. N. J1979).
  • 6Donald T. Trautman, The Role of Conflicts Think- ing in Defining the International Reach of Amer- cian Regulatory Legislation, 22 OHIO ST L. J. 586,592( 1961 ).
  • 7Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Public Law in the Interna- tional Arena : Conflict of Laws, International Law, and Somr Suggestions for Their Interaction, 163 RECUEIL DES COURS 311 (1979).
  • 8David J. Gerber, The Extraterritorial Application of the German Antitrust Laws,77 AM. J. INTLL. 783 (1983).
  • 9F. Hoffmann - La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A, 542 US 155(2004).
  • 10David J Gerber, The Extraterritorial Application of the German Antitrust Laws, 77 AM. J. INTLL. 780(1983).

二级参考文献20

  • 1[1]United States v.Aluminum Co.of America,148 F.2d 416,65 U.S.P.Q.6 (2d Cir.1945).
  • 2[2]Howard Adler/David F Laing,Application of US Antitrust Laws to Merger and Joint Ventures in a Global Economy (1),European Business Law Review,March 1997,p.82.
  • 3[3]United States v.Aluminum Co.of America,148 F.2d 416,444,443 (2d Cir.1945).
  • 4[4]Timberlane Lumber Co.v.Bank of America,549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir.1976).
  • 5[5]William C.Holmes,Antitrust Law handbook 2001 Edition,p.709.
  • 6[6]Access Telecom,Inc.v.MCI Telecommunications Corp.,197 F.3d 694 (5th Cir.1999).
  • 7[7]William C.Holmes,Antitrust law Handbook 2001 Edition,West Group,p.712.
  • 8[9]See U.S.Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission,Antitrust Enforcement Guidelines for International Operations,Sec.3.14 (April 1995).
  • 9[10]Joseph P.Griffin,Foreign Governmental Reactions to U.S.Assertions of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction,E.C.L.R.2/1998,pp.65～66.
  • 10[12]Trugman-Nash,Inc.v.New Zealand Dairy Bd.,954 F.Supp.733 (S.D.N.Y.1997).

共引文献28

河南省政法管理干部学院学报
2011年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部