摘要
长期以来,关于史学本质问题的各种认识存在着一种知识实在论的误导,即认为历史知识的性质是某种既定事实的客观性,只是有待人们去探索和揭示,并最终能够认识它。然而,历史知识在生成和被接受过程中,却表现为一种不断"异化"的特征:在由个人生成中,体现的是不同知识属性;而在社会生成上,则表现了对知识接受者的依赖性。事实上,从这一全部过程来看,关于历史知识性质的判定更取决于后者对它的重新规定。
ever since a long time ago,various awareness about the historiography's nature exists amisleading realism of knowledge,which the nature of historical knowledge is a kind of objective facts,just waiting for people to explore,to reveal,and eventually reach the goal of cognizance.However,the historical knowledge in its generating and existing status shows of " alienation ".Generated by individuals in the process,the nature of historical knowledge does not have identity,but the production of different varieties of knowledge,which embodies the knowledge of different attributes.Not only that,but this change also reflected in its social generation,namely the history in the location of the knowledge's attribute shows of the dependence on the recipient.In the whole process of generating historical knowledge and state of its existence,the judgement on the nature of historical knowledge often depends on a redefinition from the latter.
出处
《兰州学刊》
CSSCI
2011年第3期151-155,共5页
关键词
知识生成
性质判断
二元对立
knowledge generating
nature judgment
binaryo Oppositionits