论晚清文龙评批《金瓶梅》的新策略与新识见

On the New Strategies and the New Ideas in Wen Long' Criticism on Jinpingmei

文龙的《金瓶梅》评点呈现出不同于前人的新面目,原因是他采用了新的阅读策略。面对张竹坡评点,他故意反其道而读之,维护月娘、痛诋玉楼、春梅,同时提出批书者要具备客观的态度,评书时要务求"真"、"细",不能做酒醉雷公;面对性描写,他跳开传统的解读方式,把批评重心放在读者身上,提出了观此书可止淫的说法,其阅读分级标准也值得参考;面对末十回,他发现了与前九十回的艺术水平差距,据此提出作者可能江郎才尽的判断,对此,刘辉的理解不准确。

Wen Long＇ criticism on Jinpingmei takes on a new appearance different from the predecessors＇,that is because he applies a new reading strategy.In the face of the criticism of Zhang Zhupo,he deliberately reads from the opposite side to defend Wu Yueniang and to slander Meng Yulou and Pang Chunmei sternly.At the same time,he advocates that critics should possess objective attitudes.When criticizing,critics should strive for ＂truthfulness＂ and ＂carefulness＂,and can not make confused comments.Facing the sexual description,he avoids the traditional way of interpretation,and puts the critical emphasis on the readers.Thus,he brings forward the idea that Jinpingmei can prevent lewdness.Besides,his reading standards of classification are also worth consulting.Facing the last ten chapters,he finds their artistic gap with the previous ninety chapters.According to this,he raises the estimation that the literary talent of the author of Jinpingmei may be ended.Withal,the understanding of Liu Hui is not accuracy.