期刊文献+

尼莫地平对大鼠面神经损伤的保护作用及GDNF表达的影响 被引量:2

Protective function of nimodipine on facial nerve injury and its effect on expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨尼莫地平对大鼠面神经损伤的保护作用及对胶质细胞源性神经生长因子(GDNF)表达的影响。方法 96只大鼠按随机数字表法分为假手术组、单纯损伤组、尼莫地平预处理组、尼莫地平后处理组,后三组建立大鼠面神经电损伤模型。应用HE染色、Western blotting等方法,观察大鼠面神经损伤后不同时期(1、3、6月)GDNF的动态表达变化及尼莫地平不同给药时间对其表达的影响。结果 与单纯损伤组相比,尼莫地平预处理组大鼠面神经损伤程度减轻.GDNF表达升高,持续时间延长;尼莫地平预处理组GDNF表达和尼莫地平后处理组间比较差异有统计学意义(P〉0.05);尼莫地平后处理组GDNF表达在3月、6月时与单纯损伤组比较差异无统计学意SL(P〉0.05)。结论 预防性应用尼莫地平可以保护面神经,其机制可能是通过调节GDNF的表达而实现的。 Objective To study the protective function ofnimodipine on facial nerve injury and its effect on the expression ofglial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Methods Ninety-six SD rats were randomly divided into sham-operated group, facial nerve injury group, nimodipine pretreatment group, and nimodipine post-treatment group. Rat models of facial nerve injury in the later 3 groups were established. The dynamic changes of expression of GDNF were observed by HE staining and Western blotting in different treatment groups and at different time points (1, 3 and 6 months after the injury). Results Compared with the facial nerve injury group, the nimodipine pretreatment and post-treatment groups had significantly less severe nerve damage and significantly up-regulated expression of GDNF (P〈0.05). The expression of GDNF in the nimodipine pretreatment group was statistically higher than that in the nimodipine post-treatment group (P〈0.05). However, the expression of GDNF in the nimodipine post-treatment group was not statistically different from that in the facial nerve injury group 3 and 6 months after the injury (P〉0.05). Conclusion Nimodipine has significant facial nerve protective effect, and one of the mechanisms of nimodipine to protect the facial nerve is to regulate the GDNF expression.
出处 《中华神经医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期235-237,共3页 Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
关键词 面神经 尼莫地平 胶质细胞源性神经生长因子 Facial nerve Nimodipine Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Barras FM,Kuntzer T,Zurn AD,et al.Local Delivery of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Improves Facial Nerve Regeneration After Late Repair[J].The Laryngoscope,2009,119(5):846-855.
  • 2王琛,周树夏,郑春梅,邱建勇,宋俊峰.家兔面神经撞击伤后胶质细胞源性的神经营养因子mRNA在面神经元中的表达特点[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2002,20(3):178-180. 被引量:2
  • 3牛宇,胡敏,刘宇,高俊明.大鼠与家兔面神经颅外段解剖的比较研究[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(6):640-642. 被引量:6
  • 4Noh MR,Kim SK,Sun W,et al.Neuroprotective effect of topiramate on hypoxic ischemic brain injury in neonatal rats[J].Exp Neurol,2006,201(2):470-478.
  • 5Szydlowska K,Zawadzka M,Kaminska B.NeuroprotectantFK506 inhibits glutamate-induced apoptosis in vitro and in vivo[J].J Neurochem,2006,99(3):965-975.
  • 6Cheng H,Huang SS,Lin SM,et al.The neuroprotective effect of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in fibrin glue against chronic focal cerebral ischemia in conscious rats[J].Brain Res,2005,1033(1):28-33.

二级参考文献4

共引文献6

同被引文献17

  • 1杨凯,宋光太,胡居恒,詹寒,李剑.鼠神经生长因子治疗26例面神经损伤的疗效观察[J].浙江创伤外科,2006,11(2):109-109. 被引量:7
  • 2Chu TH, Wang L, Gun A, et al. GDNF-treated acellular nerve graft promotes motoneuron axon regeneration after implantation into cervical root avulsed spinal cord[J]. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 2012, 38(7): 681-695.
  • 3Bonelli RM, Hodl AK, Hofmann P, et al. Neuroprotection in Huntington's disease: a 2-year study on minocycline [J]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 2004, 19(6): 337-342.
  • 4Plane JM, Shen Y, Pleasure DE, et al. Prospects for minocycline neuroprotection[J]. Arch Neurol, 2010, 67(12): 1442-1448.
  • 5Hohman MH, Bhama PK, Hadlock TA. Epidemiology of iatrogenic facial nerve injury: a decade of experience [J]. Laryngoscope, 2014, 124(1): 260-265.
  • 6Shamji MF, Schranun DR, Benoit BG. Clinical predictors of facial nerve outcome after translabyrinthine resection of acoustic neuromas[J]. Clin Invest Med, 2007, 30(6): E233-E239.
  • 7Migliore MM, Ortiz R, Dye S, et al. Neurotrophic and neuroprotective efficacy of intranasal GDNF in a rat model of Parkinson's disease[J]. Neuroscience, 2014, 274:11-23.
  • 8Hoyng SA, De WF, Gnavi S, et al. A comparative morphological, electrophysiological and functional analysis of axon regeneration through peripheral nerve autografts genetically modified to overexpress BDNF, CNTF, GDNF, NGF, NT3 or VEGF [J]. Exp Neurol, 2014, 261: 578-93.
  • 9Garrido-Mesa N, Zarzuelo A, Galvez J. What is behind the non-antibiotic properties of minocycline[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2013, 67(1): 18-30.
  • 10Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ohgomori T, et al. Minocycline selectively inhibits Mlpolarization ofmicroglia[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2013, 4: e525.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部