期刊文献+

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中几个问题的探讨 被引量:5

Several questions in Sentinal lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝淋巴结清扫的可行性研究已经有大量的文章报道,也已经达成共识,但是,鉴于临床上还存在一定的假阴性率,这一术式还有很多值得商讨的细节问题需要进一步研究:为了减少假阴性的比例应当取多少个前哨淋巴结才能将假阴性降到最低点?前哨淋巴结阳性病例腋窝淋巴结是否全部需要清扫?手术后发现前哨淋巴结微小转移灶的如何进一步处理等。本文就以上问题作一综述。 There are a lot of feasibility studies,using sentinel lymph node biopsy SLNB instead of Alex lymph node dissection (ALND) , having got a consensus that SLNB is a safe and useful method in the treatment of breast cancer. But in clinical practice, there are much false negative rate (FNR) which need to be carefully dealt with for SLNB. In order to diminish the FNR, how many nodes should be the perfect number to lower the FNR? If positive detection was found in the SLN, should ALND always be needed? And when micro metastasis was found in the post operation HE staining? Does it need further treatment? We make a review to discuss those matters.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2011年第3期189-192,共4页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 前哨淋巴结数目 前哨淋巴结阳性 前哨淋巴结微转移 转移处理策略 Number of SLN Node positive Mierometastasis Strategy to positive node
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Torrenga H,Fabry H,van der Sijp JR,et al.Omitting axillary lymph node dissection in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients Is safe:a long term follow-up analysis[J].J Surg Oncol,2004,88 (1):4-7.
  • 2Krag DN,Anderson SJ,Julian TB,et al.Primary outcome results of NSABP B-32,a randomized phase Ⅲ clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection (SNR) to conventional axillary dissection (AD) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients[J].J Clin Oncol,2010,28:18S.
  • 3Giuliano AE,Kirgan DM,Guenther JM,et al.Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer[J].Ann Surg,1994,220(3):391-398.
  • 4Lyman GH,Giuliano AE,Somerfield MR,et al.American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2005,23(30):7703-7720.
  • 5Susanne H,Estourgie OE,Rutgers EJ,et al.What is a false-negative result for sentinel node procedures in breast cancer[J].J Surg Oncol,2003,82(3):141-142.
  • 6Chagpar AB,Scoggins CR,Martin RC 2nd,et al.Are 3 sentinel nodes sufficient[J].Arch Surg,2007,142(5):456-459.
  • 7Duncan M,Cech A,Wechter D,et al.Criteria for establishing the adequacy of a sentinel lymphadenectomy[J].Am J Surg,2004,187(5):639-642.
  • 8Chao C,Wong SL,Woo C,et al.Reliable lymphatic drainage to axillary sentinel lymph nodes regardless of tumor location within the breast[J].Am J Surg,2001,182(4):307-311.
  • 9Zavagno G,Rubello D,Franchini Z,et al.Axillary sentinel lymphnodesin breast cancer:a single lymphatic pathway drains the entire mammary gland[J].Eur J Surg Oncol,2005,31 (5):479-484.
  • 10Byrd DR,Dunnwald LK,Mankoff DA,et al.Internal mammary lymph node drainage patterns in patients with breast cancer documented by breast lymphoscintigraphy[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2001,8(3):234-240.

同被引文献49

  • 1张保宁,宣立学,张涛,王仲照,陈国际,易进,刘淋,陈盛祖.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的实践与体会[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(11):704-706. 被引量:30
  • 2贺青卿,姜军.淋巴闪烁显像与乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检[J].国际外科学杂志,2007,34(1):46-50. 被引量:9
  • 3陈捷鑫,林鹏,樊卫,吴秋良,肖平,王军业,张旭,李小东,解明然.乳腺癌内乳淋巴结活检的临床研究[J].癌症,2007,26(2):172-177. 被引量:14
  • 4顾雅佳,冯晓源,唐峰,彭卫军,毛健,杨文涛.乳腺肿瘤的MRI扩散特征及参数选定[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(5):451-456. 被引量:45
  • 5庄亚强,莫军扬,任占平,梁志东.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检及其微转移检测的临床意义[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2007,28(5):553-556. 被引量:6
  • 6Chagpar AB, Camp RL, Hiram DL. Lymph node ratio should be considered for incorporation into staging for breast cancer[ J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(11) : 3143-3148.
  • 7Hernandez- Aya LF, Chavez- Macgregor M, Lei X, et al. Nodal status and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients with triple- negative breast cancer [ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29 (19) : 2628-2634.
  • 8Okuyama N, Murakuni H, Ogata H. The use of Doppler ultrasound in evaluation of breast cancermetastasis to axillarylymph nodes [ J ]. Oncol Rep, 2004, 11(2) : 389-393.
  • 9Feu J, Tresserra F, Fabregas R, et al. Metastatic breast carcino- main axillary lymph nodes: in vitro US detection [J]. Radiology, 1997, 205(3): 831-835.
  • 10Prasad SN, Houserkova D. A comparison of mammography and ul- trasonography in the evaluate of breast masses[ J ]. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2007, 151 (2): 315-322.

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部