期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死患者不同冠状动脉病变对介入术后预后的影响 被引量:6

Impact of different infarct coronary artery on prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者不同冠状动脉病变对预后的影响。方法将117例接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者根据罪犯血管不同分为左前降支组51例、左回旋支组27例、右冠状动脉组39例。比较3组患者术后ST段回落〉70%的梗死相关导联数、TIMI血流分级、住院期间及出院后1年内主要心脏不良事件发生率。结果与左回旋支组和右冠状动脉组比较,左前降支组术后ST段完全回落的梗死相关导联数和左室射血分数显著降低(P〈0.05),心源性死亡率及总主要心脏不良事件率显著升高(P〈0.05)。结论左前降支病变者术后心电图ST段回落更缓慢、左心功能不全更严重、主要心脏不良事件发生率更高、预后更差。 Objective To evaluate the impact of different infarct coronary artery on prognosis of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 117 patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction were divided into three groups according to their different culprit vessel:Group left anterior descending(LAD) consisted of 51 patients, Group left cir- cumflex(LCX) included 27 patients and Group right coronary artery(RCA) included 39 patients. The number of ECG leads with ST-elevation resolusion(STR) 〉70% and TIMI flow grade after PCI were determined, and incidence of major adverse coronary events (MACE) during duration of hospital stay and oneear follow-up were also recorded. Results The number of ECG leads with STR 〉 70% after PCI and LVEF were significantly lower in Group LAD than those in Group LCX and RCA (P 〈 0.05 ), the incidence of cardiac death and MACE were higher in Group LAD than those in Group LCX and RCA ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions LAD infarction has been associated with poorer ST-segment resolution, greater left ventricular dysfunction and higher in
出处 《临床内科杂志》 CAS 2011年第1期33-35,共3页 Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine
关键词 急性心肌梗死 罪犯血管 预后 Acute myocardial infarction Culprit vessel Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献1

共引文献15

同被引文献61

  • 1杨璇,李玉,李长江,冯磊.GDF-15与心肌梗死后心室重塑指标的相关性[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):59-60. 被引量:12
  • 2李春慧.洛汀新与缬沙坦对老年急性心肌梗死患者心室重塑及心功能的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):82-84. 被引量:17
  • 3杨跃进.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中无再流的诊断、治疗和预防[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(7):662-664. 被引量:57
  • 4吴永全.急性冠脉综合征12导联心电图[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:3-7.
  • 5Pedersen SH,Galatius S,Hansen PR,et al.Field triagereduces treatment delay and improves long-term clinicaloutcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation my-ocardial infarction treated with primary primary percuta-neous coronary intervention[J].JAm Coll Cardiol,2009,54(8):2296-2302.
  • 6Sagit M, Korkmaz F, Kavugudurmaz M, et al. Impact of septoplasty on mean platelet volume levels in patients with marked nasal septal deviation [ J ]. J Craniofac Surg, 2012,23 ( 4 ) : 974- 976.
  • 7Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determiningthe severity of coronary heart disease [ J]. Am J Cardiol, 1983,51 (3) :606.
  • 8Endler G, Klimeseh A, Sunder-Plassmarm H, et aL Mean platelet volume is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction but not for coronary artery disease [ J ]. Br J Haematol, 2002, 117 (2) :399-404.
  • 90zlti MF, Oztiirk S, Ayhan SS, et al. Predictive value of mean platelet volume in young patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a retrospective observational study [ J]. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg, 2013,13 ( 1 ) :57-61.
  • 10Taglieri N, Saia F, Rapezzi C, et al. Prognostic significance of mean platelet volume on admission in an unselected cohort of patients with non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome [J]. Thromb Haemost, 2011,106(1) :132-140.

引证文献6

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部