期刊文献+

2008年青岛市城区部分餐饮单位控烟状况及室内烟雾浓度调查 被引量:1

Survey on the Density of Indoor Tobacco Smog and Situation of Tobacco Control in Partly Restaurant & Food Services Urban in Qingdao City,2008
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]了解餐饮单位控烟状况及室内烟雾浓度,为加强公共场所及工作场所控烟措施提供依据。[方法]2008年10月,在青岛市城区随机抽取36家餐饮单位(16家为控烟干预组,20家为对照组),调查控烟状况、工作人员和管理者控烟态度,观察和检测烟雾(PM2.5颗粒物)浓度。[结果]观察干预组16家、对照组20家。有禁烟标志者所占比例,干预组为50.00%,对照组为20.00%(P>0.05);有吸烟区或烟区划分者所占比例,干预组为37.50%,对照组为25.00%(P>0.05);调查从业人员487人(干预组240人、对照组247人),吸烟率分别为13.75%、12.96%(P>0.05);如果单位有禁止吸烟规定会要求顾客灭烟者所占比例,2组分别为67.50%、71.66%(P>0.05);认为酒店禁烟不会影响生意者所占比例,2组分别为60.83%、60.73%(P>0.05)。调查酒店餐馆管理者36人(干预组16人、对照组20人),愿意开展无烟单位创建活动者所占比例,2组分别为93.75%、80.00%(P>0.05);如果单位有禁止吸烟规定会要求顾客灭烟者所占比例,2组分别为93.75%、90.00%(P>0.05);认为禁烟不会影响生意者所占比例,2组分别为75.00%、40.00%(P<0.05);室内空气PM2.5浓度(μg/m3),干预组、对照组分别为119.08±17.56、227.62±45.04(P<0.01);室外空气PM2.5浓度,干预组、对照组分别为89.62±5.91、128.56±22.23(P<0.01)。[结论]干预后员工对控烟的认识明显提高,室内烟草烟雾浓度降低。 [Objective]To investigate the density of indoor tobacco smog inside hotel or restaurant and to provide effective-tobacco-control policy for the public place and workplace in Qingdao.[Methods]36 catering institutions were selected randomly(16 in intervention group,20 in control group),in Qingdao urban in October 2008.Smoking status,staff and managers attitude were investigated,and smoke(PM2.5 particulate) concentration was observed and detected.[Results]In intervention group,the percentage of having non-smoking sign and non-smoking or tobacco area was 50.00%,37.50%,and 20.00% and 25.00% in control group.There were no statistical significances between the two groups(P0.05).487 Employees(240 in intervention group and 247 in control group) were investiged,and the smoking rates was 13.75% and 12.96% respectively(P0.05).In intervention group and control group,there were 67.50% and 71.66% employees respectively would advise customers giving up smoking if the institutions had banned smoking provisions(P0.05),60.73% and 60.83% thought that hotel ban would not affect the business in 2 groups respectively(P0.05).36 Hotel restaurant managers were surveyed(16 in intervention group,20 in control group),93.75% and 80.00% would develop smokeless institutions creating activists(P0.05),93.75% and 90.00% respectively would advise customers giving up smoking if institutions had banned smoking provisions(P0.05),75.00% and 40.00% thought that hotel ban wouldnot affect the business in 2 groups respectively(P0.05).The level of PM2.5 inners were 119.08±17.56 μg/m3 indoor in two groups(P0.01),and 89.62±5.91 and 128.56±22.23 outside(P0.05).[Conclusion]The understandings of tobacco control are enhanced for interventional employees,and indoor tobacco smoke concentration decreases.
出处 《预防医学论坛》 2011年第3期210-212,共3页 Preventive Medicine Tribune
关键词 餐饮业 烟草烟雾 控制吸烟 Restaurant & food services Tobacco smog Tobacco control
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1崔小波,周裕斌,郭爱民,于石成,饶英生,蒋保季,段成惠,黄颖菊,杨兴华,王凯.《北京市公共场所禁止吸烟的规定》1996-1997年执行效果评价[J].中国健康教育,1998,14(5):4-7. 被引量:7
  • 2杨功焕,马杰民,刘娜,周灵妮.中国人群2002年吸烟和被动吸烟的现状调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(2):77-83. 被引量:1057
  • 3杨功焕.1996年全国吸烟行为的流行病学调查[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1997.178,233,221,182,221,1.
  • 4刘铁南.烟草经济与烟草控制[M].北京:经济出版社,2004.180.
  • 5WHO Tobacco free initiative.The role of health professionals in tobacco control[R].WHO library catal loguing-in-publication data:6.
  • 6Stayner L, Bena J, Sasco A J, et al. Lung cancer risk and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Public Health,2007,97(3) :545-551.
  • 7Michael Brauer, Andrea Mannetje. Restaurant smoking restrictions and environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Am J Public Health, 1998,18 (12) :25-29.
  • 8国家标准委员会.GB/T4754—2002国民经济行业分类.北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
  • 9世界卫生组织.烟草控制框架公约.瑞士日内瓦:世界卫生组织文件编印服务,2005:8.
  • 10Andrew Hyland,Mark J Travers, Cheryl Higbee, et al. A 24-Country Comparison of Levels of Indoor Air Pollution in Different Workplaces [ OL ]. 2006. 9. http://www. tobaccofreeair. com/ downloads/GAMS % 20report. v7 _ Sept _ 06. pdf.

共引文献59

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部